Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32977683›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

The Effectiveness of Narrative Versus Didactic Information Formats on Pregnant Women's Knowledge, Risk Perception, Self-Efficacy, and Information Seeking Related to Climate Change Health Risks.

Adebanke L Adebayo, Rochelle Davidson Mhonde, Nathaniel DeNicola, Edward Maibach

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Development of a Codebook of Online Anti-Vaccination Rhetoric to Manage COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adebanke L AdebayoDepartment at George Mason University, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
Rochelle Davidson MhondeDepartment at George Mason University, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
Nathaniel DeNicolaSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Edward MaibachCenter for Climate Change Communication, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3409-9187

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change is a global threat that poses significant risks to pregnant women and to their developing fetus and newborn. Educating pregnant women about the risks to their pregnancy may improve maternal and child health outcomes. Prior research suggests that presenting health information in narrative format can be more effective than a didactic format. Hence, the purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of two brief educational interventions in a diverse group of pregnant women (

Indexed as

Climate ChangeHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInformation Seeking BehaviorSelf EfficacyAdultFemaleHealth EducationHumansInfant, NewbornOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Education as TopicPerceptionPregnancyPregnant Peopleclimate changeinformation-seekingnarrative communicationpregnant womenrisk perceptionself-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID32977683
PMCPMC7579394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.