ArticleRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2020
The relative biological effectiveness of carbon ion radiation therapy for early stage lung cancer.
Article in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of Carbon Ion and Its Sensitizing Agent in Cancer Therapy: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- PARP Inhibitors as Radiosensitizers: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Relative Biological Effectiveness of Carbon Ion Versus Photon Radiation Therapy for Acute Radiation-Induced Esophagitis in Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Derived From Normal Tissue Complication Probability Modeling.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Effectiveness and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Data Science Opportunities To Improve Radiotherapy Planning and Clinical Decision Making.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2024Review
- Carbon Ion Radiobiology.Cancers · 2020Review
- FLUKA Monte Carlo-based Evaluation of Linear Energy Transfer Distributions for Monoenergetic Therapeutic Carbon-ion Beams in Water.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeCarbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) is recognized as an effective alternative treatment modality for early stage lung cancer, but a quantitative understanding of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) compared to photon therapy is lacking. In this work, a mechanistic tumor response model previously validated for lung photon radiotherapy was used to estimate the RBE of CIRT compared to photon radiotherapy, as a function of dose and the fractionation schedule. MATERIALS AND
methodsClinical outcome data of 9 patient cohorts (394 patients) treated with CIRT for early stage lung cancer, representing all published data, were included. Fractional dose, number of fractions, treatment schedule, and local control rates were used for model simulations relative to standard photon outcomes. Four parameters were fitted: α, α/β, and the oxygen enhancement ratios of cells either accessing only glucose, not oxygen (OER
resultsBest-fit CIRT parameters were: α = 1.12 Gy
conclusionFitted radiobiological parameters were consistent with known carbon in vitro radiobiology, and the resulting dose-response curve well-fitted the reported data over a wide range of dose-fractionation schemes. The same model, with only a few fitted parameters of clear mechanistic meaning, thus synthesizes both photon radiotherapy and CIRT clinical experience with early stage lung tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.