Observational studyCurrent biology : CB2020
Real-Time Assembly of Coordination Patterns in Human Infants.
Observational study in Current biology : CB, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Individual differences in how infants change behaviours from spontaneous to instrumental.Communications psychology · 2025Article
- Environments "develop": Infant motor development can inform the study of physical space.New ideas in psychology · 2025Article
- The role of action concepts in physical reasoning: insights from late childhood.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Materiality and Cognitive Development: Contemporary Debates and Empirical Studies in Early Childhood.Europe's journal of psychology · 2024Article
- Article
- Equifinality in infancy: The many paths to walking.Developmental psychobiology · 2023Article
- The effects of typical ageing on cognitive control: recent advances and future directions.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Review
- Eight-Month-Old Infants Meta-Learn by Downweighting Irrelevant Evidence.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2023Article
- Optimization of modularity during development to simplify walking control across multiple steps.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2023Article
- Changes in the Complexity of Limb Movements during the First Year of Life across Different Tasks.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Lie to my face: An electromyography approach to the study of deceptive behavior.Brain and behavior · 2021Article
- Applications of Pose Estimation in Human Health and Performance across the Lifespan.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- (Hyper)active Data Curation: A Video Case Study from Behavioral Science.Journal of escience librarianship · 2021Article
- An update of the development of motor behavior.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive scienceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Flexibility and generativity are fundamental aspects of functional behavior that begin in infancy and improve with experience. How do infants learn to tailor their real-time solutions to variations in local conditions? On a nativist view, the developmental process begins with innate prescribed solutions, and experience elaborates on those solutions to suit variations in the body and the environment. On an emergentist view, infants begin by generating a variety of strategies indiscriminately, and experience teaches them to select solutions tailored to the current relations between their body and the environment. To disentangle these accounts, we observed coordination patterns in 11-month-old pre-walking infants with a range of cruising (moving sideways in an upright posture while holding onto a support) and crawling experience as they cruised over variable distances between two handrails they held for support. We identified infants' coordination patterns using a novel combination of computer-vision, machine-learning, and time-series analyses. As predicted by the emergentist view, the least experienced infants generated multiple coordination patterns inconsistently regardless of body size and handrail distance, whereas the most experienced infants tailored their coordination patterns to body-environment relations and switched solutions only when necessary. Moreover, the beneficial effects of experience were specific to cruising and not crawling, although both skills involve anti-phase coordination among the four limbs. Thus, findings support an emergentist view and suggest that everyday experience with the target skill may promote "learning to learn," where infants learn to assemble the appropriate solution for new problems on the fly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.