Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32976812›Full record

Observational studyCurrent biology : CB2020

Real-Time Assembly of Coordination Patterns in Human Infants.

Ori Ossmy, Karen E Adolph

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Current biology : CB, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The role of action concepts in physical reasoning: insights from late childhood.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Equifinality in infancy: The many paths to walking.Developmental psychobiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Eight-Month-Old Infants Meta-Learn by Downweighting Irrelevant Evidence.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. An update of the development of motor behavior.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ori OssmyDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Karen E AdolphDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: karenadolph@nyu.edu.

Funding

Flexibility of Learning in Infant Skill AcquisitionR01HD033486 · NICHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ADOLPH, KAREN E · 2001 to 2023
$4.5M
Learning About Hidden AffordancesR01HD086034 · NICHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ADOLPH, KAREN E, TAMIS-LEMONDA, CATHERINE S · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD033486NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD086034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flexibility and generativity are fundamental aspects of functional behavior that begin in infancy and improve with experience. How do infants learn to tailor their real-time solutions to variations in local conditions? On a nativist view, the developmental process begins with innate prescribed solutions, and experience elaborates on those solutions to suit variations in the body and the environment. On an emergentist view, infants begin by generating a variety of strategies indiscriminately, and experience teaches them to select solutions tailored to the current relations between their body and the environment. To disentangle these accounts, we observed coordination patterns in 11-month-old pre-walking infants with a range of cruising (moving sideways in an upright posture while holding onto a support) and crawling experience as they cruised over variable distances between two handrails they held for support. We identified infants' coordination patterns using a novel combination of computer-vision, machine-learning, and time-series analyses. As predicted by the emergentist view, the least experienced infants generated multiple coordination patterns inconsistently regardless of body size and handrail distance, whereas the most experienced infants tailored their coordination patterns to body-environment relations and switched solutions only when necessary. Moreover, the beneficial effects of experience were specific to cruising and not crawling, although both skills involve anti-phase coordination among the four limbs. Thus, findings support an emergentist view and suggest that everyday experience with the target skill may promote "learning to learn," where infants learn to assemble the appropriate solution for new problems on the fly.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentExtremitiesFemaleHumansInfantLearningMaleMotor SkillsVideo RecordingWalkingartificial intelligencebehavioral flexibilitycomputer visioncruisinginfantslimb coordinationlocomotionmachine learningmotor developmentproblem solving

Identifiers

PMID32976812
PMCPMC8722405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.