Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32976808›Full record

Observational studyCurrent biology : CB2020

Transient Disruption of the Inferior Parietal Lobule Impairs the Ability to Attribute Intention to Action.

Jean-François Patri, Andrea Cavallo, Kiri Pullar, Marco Soriano, Martina Valente, Atesh Koul, Alessio Avenanti, Stefano Panzeri, Cristina Becchio

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Current biology : CB, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. How choice and motor mimicry affect affiliation: An fNIRS study.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  13. Dissociating goal from outcome during action observation.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The Role of Agentive and Physical Forces in the Neural Representation of Motion Events.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  16. Action prediction in psychosis.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Kinematic priming of action predictions.Current biology : CB · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jean-François PatriCognition, Motion & Neuroscience, Center for Human Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy; Neural Computation Lab, Center for Human Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Andrea CavalloCognition, Motion & Neuroscience, Center for Human Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy; Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Kiri PullarCognition, Motion & Neuroscience, Center for Human Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy; Neural Computation Lab, Center for Human Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Marco SorianoCognition, Motion & Neuroscience, Center for Human Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy; Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Martina ValenteNeural Computation Lab, Center for Human Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy; Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.
Atesh KoulCognition, Motion & Neuroscience, Center for Human Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Alessio AvenantiCenter for Studies and Research in Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Cesena, Italy; Centro de Investigación en Neuropsicología y Neurociencias Cognitivas, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Chile.
Stefano PanzeriNeural Computation Lab, Center for Human Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy. Electronic address: stefano.panzeri@iit.it.
Cristina BecchioCognition, Motion & Neuroscience, Center for Human Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy. Electronic address: cristina.becchio@iit.it.
Italian Institute of Technology · ITCatholic University of the Maule · CLUniversity of Trento · IT

Funding

Readout and control of spatiotemporal neuronal codes for behaviorU19NS107464 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SHOHAM, SHY · 2018 to 2022
$17.3M
Studying perceptual decision-making across cortex by combining population imaging, connectomics, and computational modelingR01NS108410 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI HARVEY, CHRISTOPHER D, LEE, WEI-CHUNG ALLEN · 2018 to 2022
$5.7M
Mapping of spatiotemporal code features to neural and perceptual spacesR01NS109961 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PANZERI, STEFANO VT, RINBERG, DMITRY · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS108410NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS109961NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS107464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although it is well established that fronto-parietal regions are active during action observation, whether they play a causal role in the ability to infer others' intentions from visual kinematics remains undetermined. In the experiments reported here, we combined offline continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) with computational modeling to reveal and causally probe single-trial computations in the inferior parietal lobule (IPL) and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). Participants received cTBS over the left anterior IPL and the left IFG pars orbitalis in separate sessions before completing an intention discrimination task (discriminate intention of observed reach-to-grasp acts) or a kinematic discrimination task unrelated to intention (discriminate peak wrist height of the same acts). We targeted intention-sensitive regions whose fMRI activity, recorded when observing the same reach-to-grasp acts, could accurately discriminate intention. We found that transient disruption of activity of the left IPL, but not the IFG, impaired the observer's ability to attribute intention to action. Kinematic discrimination unrelated to intention, in contrast, was largely unaffected. Computational analyses of how encoding (mapping of intention to movement kinematics) and readout (mapping of kinematics to intention choices) intersect at the single-trial level revealed that IPL cTBS did not diminish the overall sensitivity of intention readout to movement kinematics. Rather, it selectively misaligned intention readout with respect to encoding, deteriorating mapping from informative kinematic features to intention choices. These results provide causal evidence of how the left anterior IPL computes mapping from kinematics to intentions.

Indexed as

IntentionAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaBrain MappingDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleHand StrengthHumansLogistic ModelsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleModels, NeurologicalMovementParietal LobePrefrontal CortexTheta Rhythmaction observationcTBSencodinginferior frontal gyrusinferior parietal lobuleintentionintersectionkinematicsreadoutsingle-trial analysis

Identifiers

PMID32976808
PMCPMC7726027
OpenAlexW3089030186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.