Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32976801›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2020

A Putative Bet-Hedging Strategy Buffers Budding Yeast against Environmental Instability.

Laura E Bagamery, Quincey A Justman, Ethan C Garner, Andrew W Murray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Organelle partitioning in the multi-budding yeastbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Trainable computation in molecular networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura E BagameryDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, 52 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Quincey A JustmanDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, 52 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Ethan C GarnerDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, 52 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. Electronic address: egarner@g.harvard.edu.
Andrew W MurrayDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, 52 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. Electronic address: awm@mcb.harvard.edu.

Funding

FEEDBACK CONTROL OF THE CELL CYCLER01GM043987 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI MURRAY, ANDREW W · 1990 to 2023
$6.4M
Dissecting bacterial cell wall synthesis using in vivo single molecule trackingDP2AI117923 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI GARNER, ETHAN CLARK · 2014 to 2014
$2.3M
NIAID NIH HHS DP2 AI117923NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM043987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To grow and divide, cells must extract resources from dynamic and unpredictable environments. Many organisms use different metabolic strategies for distinct contexts. Budding yeast can produce ATP from carbon sources by mechanisms that prioritize either speed (fermentation) or yield (respiration). Withdrawing glucose from exponentially growing cells reveals variability in their ability to switch from fermentation to respiration. We observe two subpopulations of glucose-starved cells: recoverers, which rapidly adapt and resume growth, and arresters, which enter a shock state characterized by deformation of many cellular structures, including mitochondria. These states are heritable, and on high glucose, arresters grow and divide faster than recoverers. Recoverers have a fitness advantage during a carbon source shift but are less fit in a constant, high-glucose environment, and we observe natural variation in the frequency of the two states across wild yeast strains. These experiments suggest that bet hedging has evolved in budding yeast.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalModels, BiologicalCell DivisionFermentationGlucoseGlycolysisMetabolic Networks and PathwaysSaccharomyces cerevisiaeGlucosebet hedgingbimodalitybudding yeastfermentationmetabolismmitochondriarespiration

Identifiers

PMID32976801
PMCPMC7726042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.