Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32976728›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of psychology2021

The Psychology of Reaching: Action Selection, Movement Implementation, and Sensorimotor Learning.

Hyosub E Kim, Guy Avraham, Richard B Ivry

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Detrimental Effect of Stroke on Motor Adaptation.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Feasible cognition requires latent state.Biological cybernetics · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Sensorimotor confidence during explicit motor adaptation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Competition between Tool and Hand Motion Impairs Movement Planning in Limb Apraxia.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  17. Attention Defines the Context for Implicit Sensorimotor Adaptation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hyosub E KimDepartments of Physical Therapy, Psychological and Brain Sciences, and Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, USA.
Guy AvrahamDepartment of Psychology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA; email: ivry@berkeley.edu.
Richard B IvryDepartment of Psychology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA; email: ivry@berkeley.edu.
University of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Delaware · US

Funding

MULTICENTER CAREER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR PHYSICAL AND OCCUPATIONAL THERAPYK12HD055931 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HAYES, MARCIE HARRIS · 2007 to 2021
$12.7M
Human Cerebellar Function in Multiple Task DomainsR35NS116883 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI RICHARD IVRY · 2020 to 2026
$5.3M
The role of the cerebellum in speechR01DC017091 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI John Francis Houde, RICHARD IVRY · 2019 to 2026
$4.5M
Specifying the constraints on cerebellar dependent sensorimotor adaptationR01NS105839 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI IVRY, RICHARD · 2018 to 2019
$709k
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055931NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017091NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105839NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS116883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of motor planning and learning in humans has undergone a dramatic transformation in the 20 years since this journal's last review of this topic. The behavioral analysis of movement, the foundational approach for psychology, has been complemented by ideas from control theory, computer science, statistics, and, most notably, neuroscience. The result of this interdisciplinary approach has been a focus on the computational level of analysis, leading to the development of mechanistic models at the psychological level to explain how humans plan, execute, and consolidate skilled reaching movements. This review emphasizes new perspectives on action selection and motor planning, research that stands in contrast to the previously dominant representation-based perspective of motor programming, as well as an emerging literature highlighting the convergent operation of multiple processes in sensorimotor learning.

Indexed as

LearningMotor ActivityMovementDecision MakingHumansaction selectioncomputational modelsmotor planningmovement executionreachingsensorimotor learning

Identifiers

PMID32976728
PMCPMC8514106
OpenAlexW3088756089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.