Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32976521›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Evaluation of the GenoType NTM-DR assay performance for the identification and molecular detection of antibiotic resistance in Mycobacterium abscessus complex.

Nicolas Bouzinbi, Olivier Marcy, Thibault Bertolotti, Raphael Chiron, Pascale Bemer, Martine Pestel-Caron, Olivia Peuchant, Hélène Guet-Revillet, Marie-Sarah Fangous, Geneviève Héry-Arnaud and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Short SignatureMicrobiology spectrum · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicolas BouzinbiLaboratoire de Bactériologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Olivier MarcyBordeaux Population Health Centre U1219, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Thibault BertolottiLaboratoire de Bactériologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Raphael ChironCystic Fibrosis Centre, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Pascale BemerBacteriology-Hospital Hygiene Department, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes University, Nantes, France.
Martine Pestel-CaronUNIROUEN, GRAM EA2656, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie Université, Rouen, France.
Olivia PeuchantUSC EA 3671 Infections Humaines à Mycoplasmes et à Chlamydiae, Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Hélène Guet-RevilletCHU de Toulouse, Laboratoire de Bactériologie-Hygiène, Institut Fédératif de Biologie, Toulouse, France.
Marie-Sarah FangousBacteriology-Hospital Hygiene Department, University Hospital of Brest, Brest University, Brest, France.
Geneviève Héry-ArnaudBacteriology-Hospital Hygiene Department, University Hospital of Brest, Brest University, Brest, France.
Abdoul-Salam OuedraogoLaboratory Department, Sourô Sanou University Hospital, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Anne-Laure BañulsLaboratoire de Bactériologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Sylvain GodreuilLaboratoire de Bactériologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3436-0082
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRNazi Boni University · BFNormandie Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first objective of this study was to determine the GenoType NTM-DR assay performance for subspecies identification in Mycobacterium abscessus complex isolates. The second objective was to evaluate the GenoType NTM-DR assay ability to detect clarithromycin and amikacin resistance in M. abscessus complex isolates compared with drug susceptibility testing (DST) and PCR sequencing of the erm(41), rrl and rrs genes. The concordance between the GenoType NTM-DR and MLST results concerning subspecies identification was 100%. The wild type and mutated alleles of the rrl and rrs genes were detected by the GenoType NTM-DR assay and PCR sequencing with 100% (115/115) agreement. Similarly, 100% concordance between GenoType NTM-DR and DST was observed for clarithromycin and amikacin testing. Sensitivity for the detection of clarithromycin and amikacin resistance was 100%. The GenoType NTM-DR assay provides a robust and complementary tool to the gold standard methods (MLST and broth microdilution) for subspecies identification and drug resistance detection.

Indexed as

Reagent Kits, DiagnosticAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsClarithromycinDNA, BacterialDNA Mutational AnalysisDrug Resistance, BacterialGenes, BacterialGenotyping TechniquesHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMultilocus Sequence TypingMutationMycobacterium abscessusMycobacterium Infections, NontuberculousPolymerase Chain ReactionAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsClarithromycinDNA, BacterialReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID32976521
PMCPMC7518582
OpenAlexW3088953327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.