ArticlePloS one2020
Ultrasound-stimulated microbubble radiation enhancement of tumors: Single-dose and fractionated treatment evaluation.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Evaluation of CNS xenograft brain tumour response to MRI-guided focused ultrasound in combination with radiation therapy.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Article
- Recent advances in photoacoustic-ultrasound dual-modality fusion imaging for functional visualization of the superficial tumor microenvironment.Oncology reviews · 2026Review
- ASMase Activation in Ultrasound-Stimulated Radiation Enhancement Using MRI-Guided Focused Ultrasound.Cells · 2025Article
- Progression in low-intensity ultrasound-induced tumor radiosensitization.Cancer medicine · 2024Review
- Novel MRI-guided focussed ultrasound stimulated microbubble radiation enhancement treatment for breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Radiation combined with ultrasound and microbubbles: A potential novel strategy for cancer treatment.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2023Review
- Ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles enhancement of fractionated radiation for tumor treatment.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- MR-guided ultrasound-stimulated microbubble therapy enhances radiation-induced tumor response.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The Promise of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Radiation Oncology Practice in the Management of Brain, Prostate, and GI Malignancies.JCO global oncology · 2022Review
- Application of Ultrasound Combined with Microbubbles for Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Noninvasive optoacoustic imaging of breast tumor microvasculature in response to radiotherapy.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Ultrasound-Stimulated Microbubbles Inhibit Aggressive Phenotypes and Promotes Radiosensitivity of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Bioengineered · 2021Article
- The promising shadow of microbubble over medical sciences: from fighting wide scope of prevalence disease to cancer eradication.Journal of biomedical science · 2021Review
- Radioimmunotherapy Combined With Low-Intensity Ultrasound and Microbubbles: A Potential Novel Strategy for Treatment of Solid Tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Ultrasound-Based Radiation Enhancement: Concepts, Mechanisms and Therapeutic Applications.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
- Focused Ultrasound and Ultrasound Stimulated Microbubbles in Radiotherapy Enhancement for Cancer Treatment.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of ultrasound-stimulated microbubble therapy has successfully been used to target tumor vasculature and enhance the effects of radiation therapy in tumor xenografts in mice. Here, we further investigate this treatment using larger, more clinically relevant tumor models. New Zealand white rabbits bearing prostate tumor (PC3) xenografts received a single treatment of either ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (USMB), ionizing radiation (XRT; 8Gy), or a combination of both treatments (USMB+XRT). Treatment outcome was evaluated 24 hours after treatment using histopathology, immunolabeling, 3D Doppler ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging. A second cohort of rabbits received multiple treatments over a period of three weeks, where USMB treatments were delivered twice weekly with daily XRT treatments to deliver a fractionated 2Gy dose five days per week. A significant decrease in vascular function, observed through immunolabeling of vascular endothelial cells, was observed in tumors receiving the combined treatment (USMB+XRT) compared to control and single treatment groups. This was associated with an increase in cell death as observed through in situ end labeling (ISEL), a decrease in vascular index measured by Power Doppler imaging, and a decrease in oxygen saturation. In rabbits undergoing the long-term fractionated combined treatment, a significant growth delay was observed after 1 week and a significant reduction in tumor size was observed after 3 weeks with combined therapy. Results demonstrated an enhancement of radiation effect and superior anti-tumor effect of the combination of USMB+XRT compared to the single treatments alone. Tumor growth was maximally inhibited with fractionated radiotherapy combined with the ultrasound-stimulated microbubble-based therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.