Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32975864›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2021

Gestational age limits for abortion and cross-border reproductive care in Europe: a mixed-methods study.

S De Zordo, G Zanini, J Mishtal, C Garnsey, A-K Ziegler, C Gerdts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S De ZordoDepartment of Anthropology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8956-6566
G ZaniniDepartment of People and Organisations, School of Business and Management, Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3031-7282
J MishtalDepartment of Anthropology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3292-7236
C GarnseyIbis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6036-8195
A-K ZieglerUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1919-7686
C GerdtsIbis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2488-5072

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 680004Spanish Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad RYC-2015-19206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesLittle is known about the experiences of women who travel within Europe for abortion care from countries with relatively liberal laws. This paper aims to assess the primary reasons for travel among a sample of women who travelled from European countries with relatively liberal abortion laws to obtain abortion care mainly in the UK and the Netherlands.

designMulti-country, 5-year mixed methods study on barriers to legal abortion and travel for abortion.

settingUK, the Netherlands and Spain. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: We present quantitative data from 204 surveys, and qualitative data from 30 in-depth interviews with pregnant people who travelled to the UK, the Netherlands and Spain from countries where abortion is legal on broad grounds within specific gestational age (GA) limits.

methodsMixed-methods.

main outcome measuresGA when presenting at abortion clinic, primary reason for abortion-related travel.

resultsStudy participants overwhelmingly reported travelling for abortion because they had exceeded GA limits in their country of residence. Participants also reported numerous delays and barriers to receiving care.

conclusionsOur findings highlight the need for policies that support access to abortion throughout pregnancy and illustrate that early access to it is necessary but not sufficient to meet people's reproductive health needs.

fundingThis study is funded by the European Research Council (ERC). TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: This study shows that GA limits drive women from EU countries where abortion is legal to seek abortions abroad.

Indexed as

Gestational AgeAbortion, LegalAdolescentAdultAttitude to HealthEuropeFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth PolicyHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMedical TourismPregnancyQualitative ResearchReproductive Health ServicesYoung AdultAbortiondelaysgestational age limitsreproductive healthtravel

Identifiers

PMID32975864
PMCPMC7984202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.