Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32975699›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2020

Alterations in the mechanical, chemical and biocompatibility properties of low-cost polyethylene and polyester meshes after steam sterilization.

Reiko Wiessner, R Lorenz, A Gehring, T Kleber, C Benz, M Sander, D-U Richter, M Philipp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The value and role of mosquito meshes in low resource and poor income settings.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021
    Article
  4. The value and role of mosquito meshes in low resource and poor income settings: author's reply.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Reiko WiessnerDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Bodden-Kliniken Ribnitz-Damgarten, Sandhufe 2, 18311, Ribnitz-Damgarten, Germany. r.wiessner@bodden-kliniken.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9364-4336
R Lorenz3+ Chirurgen, Berlin-Spandau, Germany.
A GehringDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Bodden-Kliniken Ribnitz-Damgarten, Sandhufe 2, 18311, Ribnitz-Damgarten, Germany.
T KleberDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Helios Klinikum Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany.
C BenzInstitute of Structural Mechanics (StM), University of Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Str. 2, 18059, Rostock, Germany.
M SanderInstitute of Structural Mechanics (StM), University of Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Str. 2, 18059, Rostock, Germany.
D-U RichterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
M PhilippDepartment of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn Africa and other Low Resource Settings (LRS), the guideline-based and thus in most cases mesh-based treatment of inguinal hernias is only feasible to a very limited extent. This has led to an increased use of low cost meshes (LCMs, mostly mosquito meshes) for patients in LRS. Most of the LCMs used are made of polyethylene or polyester, which must be sterilized before use. The aim of our investigations was to determine changes in the biocompatibility of fibroblasts as well as mechanical and chemical properties of LCMs after steam sterilization. MATERIAL AND

methodsTwo large-pored LCMs made of polyester and polyethylene in a size of 11 x 6 cm were cut and steam sterilized at 100, 121 and 134 °C. These probes and non-sterile meshes were then subjected to mechanical tensile tests in vertical and horizontal tension, chemical analyses and biocompatibility tests with human fibroblasts. All meshes were examined by stereomicroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), LDH (cytotoxicity) measurement, viability testing, pH, lactate and glycolysis determination.

resultsEven macroscopically, polyethylene LCMs showed massive shrinkage after steam sterilization, especially at 121 and 134 °C. While polyester meshes showed no significant changes after sterilization with regard to deformation and damage as well as tensile force and stiffness, only the unsterile polyethylene mesh and the mesh sterilized at 100 °C could be tested mechanically due to the shrinkage of the other specimen. For these meshes the tensile forces were about four times higher than for polyester LCMs. Chemical analysis showed that the typical melting point of polyester LCMs was between 254 and 269 °C. Contrary to the specifications, the polyethylene LCM did not consist of low-density polyethylene, but rather high-density polyethylene and therefore had a melting point of 137 °C, so that the marked shrinkage described above occurred. Stereomicroscopy confirmed the shrinkage of polyethylene LCMs already after sterilization at 100 °C in contrast to polyester LCMs. Surprisingly, cytotoxicity (LDH measurement) was lowest for both non-sterile LCMs, while polyethylene LCMs sterilized at 100 and 121 °C in particular showed a significant increase in cytotoxicity 48 hours after incubation with fibroblasts. Glucose metabolism showed no significant changes between sterile and non-sterile polyethylene and polyester LCMs.

conclusionThe process of steam sterilization significantly alters mechanical and structural properties of synthetic hernia mesh implants. Our findings do not support a use of low-cost meshes because of their unpredictable properties after steam sterilization.

Indexed as

SteamFemaleHumansMalePolyethyleneSterilizationSurgical MeshPolyethyleneSteamBiocompatibilityInguinal hernia repairLow cost meshShrinkingSterilization

Identifiers

PMID32975699
PMCPMC7701087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.