Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32975654›Full record

ReviewAnimal cognition2020

Magnetoreception in Hymenoptera: importance for navigation.

Pauline N Fleischmann, Robin Grob, Wolfgang Rössler

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal cognition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Magnetoreception in Cataglyphis hellenica ants.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Neuromorphic encoding strategies for a noisy magnetic sense.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Neuromorphic antennal sensory system.Nature communications · 2024
    Article
  9. Importance of magnetic information for neuronal plasticity in desert ants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Insect magnetoreception: a Cry for mechanistic insights.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Review
  12. Scanning behaviour in ants: an interplay between random-rate processes and oscillators.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Article
  13. The role of learning-walk related multisensory experience in rewiring visual circuits in the desert ant brain.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Exposure to Magnetic Fields Changes the Behavioral Pattern in Honeybees (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  17. Behavioral performance and division of labor influence brain mosaicism in the leafcutter ant Atta cephalotes.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Environmental sources of radio frequency noise: potential impacts on magnetoreception.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pauline N FleischmannBehavioral Physiology and Sociobiology (Zoology II), Biozentrum, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074, Würzburg, Germany. pauline.fleischmann@uni-wuerzburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5051-884X
Robin GrobBehavioral Physiology and Sociobiology (Zoology II), Biozentrum, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0096-4040
Wolfgang RösslerBehavioral Physiology and Sociobiology (Zoology II), Biozentrum, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5195-8214
University of Würzburg · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FL1060/1-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft RO1177/7-1Klaus Tschira Stiftung GSO/KT 16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of information provided by the geomagnetic field (GMF) for navigation is widespread across the animal kingdom. At the same time, the magnetic sense is one of the least understood senses. Here, we review evidence for magnetoreception in Hymenoptera. We focus on experiments aiming to shed light on the role of the GMF for navigation. Both honeybees and desert ants are well-studied experimental models for navigation, and both use the GMF for specific navigational tasks under certain conditions. Cataglyphis desert ants use the GMF as a compass cue for path integration during their initial learning walks to align their gaze directions towards the nest entrance. This represents the first example for the use of the GMF in an insect species for a genuine navigational task under natural conditions and with all other navigational cues available. We argue that the recently described magnetic compass in Cataglyphis opens up a new integrative approach to understand the mechanisms underlying magnetoreception in Hymenoptera on different biological levels.

Indexed as

AntsAnimalsCuesHoming BehaviorLearningWalkingActive sensingCataglpyhis desert antsHoneybeesLearning walksMagnetic compassPath integration

Identifiers

PMID32975654
PMCPMC7700068
OpenAlexW3088618787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.