Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32975606›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2021

Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury among parous women.

Gabriel Levin, Amihai Rottenstreich, Abraham Tsur, Tal Cahan, Rakefet Yoeli-Ullman, Daniel Shai, Raanan Meyer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The role of fetal viability in perineal and anal sphincter injury: Insights from a large cohort study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Berlin survey on obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI).Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gabriel Levin *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, POB 12000, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel. Levin.gaby@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1282-5379
Amihai Rottenstreich *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, POB 12000, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel.
Abraham TsurThe Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Tal CahanThe Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Rakefet Yoeli-UllmanThe Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Daniel ShaiThe Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Raanan MeyerThe Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNulliparity and operative vaginal delivery are established risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). However, risk factors for OASIS occurrence among parous women delivering vaginally are not well-established. We aimed to study the risk factors for OASI occurrence among parous women.

methodsA retrospective study including all parous women who delivered vaginally at term during 2011-2019 at a university hospital. Deliveries of parous women with OASI were compared to deliveries without OASI. The risk factors associated with OASI were investigated.

resultsOverall, 35,397 women were included in the study with an OASI rate of 0.4% (n = 144). A higher rate of only one previous vaginal delivery was noted in the OASI group (78.5% vs. 46.4%, OR [95% CI] 4.20, 2.82-6.25, p < 0.001). The rate of vacuum-assisted deliveries was comparable between the study groups. The median birth weight was higher among the OASI group (3566 vs. 3300 g, p < 0.001), as was the rate of macrosomic neonates (19.4% vs. 5.5%, OR [95% CI] 4.15, 2.74-6.29, p < 0.001). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, only two factors were independently positively associated with the occurrence of OASI: a history of only one previous vaginal delivery (adjusted OR [95% CI] 4.34, 2.90-6.49, p = 0.001), and neonatal birth-weight (for each 500 g increment) (adjusted OR [95% CI] 2.51, 1.84-3.44, p < 0.001).

conclusionsAmong parous women, the only factors found to be independently positively associated with OASI were the order of parity and neonatal birth-weight. Vacuum-assisted delivery was not associated with an increased risk of OASI among parous women.

Indexed as

Birth WeightParityAdultAnal CanalCohort StudiesDelivery, ObstetricEpisiotomyFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLacerationsObstetrical ForcepsObstetric Labor ComplicationsPerineumPregnancyRetrospective StudiesBirthweightEpisiotomyObstetric anal sphincter injuryParityParousVacuum-assisted delivery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.