Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32975573›Full record

Observational studyJAMA network open2020

Incidence, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Interval Breast Cancers Compared With Screening-Detected Breast Cancers.

Saroj Niraula, Natalie Biswanger, PingZhao Hu, Pascal Lambert, Kathleen Decker

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05787249 (Improving Utilization of Supplemental Breast MRI Screening for Women With Extremely Dense Breasts), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05787249 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Improving Utilization of Supplemental Breast MRI Screening for Women With Extremely Dense Breasts

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineRan2023 to 2025Enrolled1,358ConditionsBreast CancerArmsPatient nudge, Provider nudge
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Saroj NiraulaSection of Medical Oncology and hematology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Natalie BiswangerCancer Screening program, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
PingZhao HuDepartment of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Pascal LambertResearch Institute of Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Kathleen DeckerResearch Institute of Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Research Institute in Oncology and Hematology · CACancerCare Manitoba · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Breast cancer comprises a highly heterogeneous group of diseases. Many breast cancers, particularly the more lethal ones, may not satisfy the assumptions about biology and natural history of breast cancer necessary for screening mammography to be effective. Objectives: To compare tumor characteristics of breast cancers diagnosed within 2 years of a normal screening mammogram (interval breast cancer [IBC]) with those of screen-detected breast cancers (SBC) and to compare breast cancer-specific mortality of IBC with SBC. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this registry-based cohort study, we collected data about relevant tumor- and patient-related variables on women diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2004 and June 2010 who participated in the population-based screening program in Manitoba, Canada, and those diagnosed with breast cancer outside the screening program in the province. We performed multinomial logistic regression analysis to assess tumor and patient characteristics associated with a diagnosis of IBC compared with SBC. Competing risk analysis was performed to examine risk of death by cancer detection method. Exposures: Breast cancer diagnosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Differences in tumor characteristics and breast cancer-specific mortality. Results: A total of 69 025 women aged 50 to 64 years had 212 screening mammograms during the study period. There were 1687 breast cancer diagnoses (705 SBC, 206 IBC, 275 were noncompliant, and 501 were detected outside the screening program), and 225 deaths (170 breast cancer-specific deaths). Interval cancers were more likely than SBC to be of high grade and estrogen receptor negative (odds ratio [OR], 6.33; 95% CI, 3.73-10.75; P < .001; and OR, 2.88; 95% CI, 2.01-4.13; P < .001, respectively). After a median follow-up of 7 years, breast cancer-specific mortality was significantly higher for IBC compared with SBC cancers (hazard ratio [HR] 3.55; 95% CI, 2.01-6.28; P < .001), for a sojorn time of 2 years. Non-breast cancer mortality was similar between IBC and SBC (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.43-4.15). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, interval cancers were highly prevalent in women participating in population screening, represented a worse biology, and had a hazard for breast cancer death more than 3-fold that for SBC. Strategies beyond current mammographic screening practices are needed to reduce incidence, improve detection, and reduce deaths from these potentially lethal breast cancers.

Indexed as

Time FactorsBreast NeoplasmsCanadaEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIncidenceLogistic ModelsMammographyMiddle AgedOdds RatioProportional Hazards ModelsRegistriesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID32975573
PMCPMC7519419
OpenAlexW3088525786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.