Observational studyJAMA network open2020
Incidence, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Interval Breast Cancers Compared With Screening-Detected Breast Cancers.
Observational study in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05787249 (Improving Utilization of Supplemental Breast MRI Screening for Women With Extremely Dense Breasts), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving Utilization of Supplemental Breast MRI Screening for Women With Extremely Dense Breasts
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Use of artificial intelligence for image analysis in breast cancer screening programmes: systematic review of test accuracy.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021Pooled it
- Evaluating the Performance of Mammogram-Based AI Risk Model in Predicting Subsequent Breast Cancer in Women with a Prior History of Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Circulating Thioredoxin 1 as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Detection: A Multicenter Clinical Validation Study.Cancers · 2026Article
- Individualised progesterone receptor modulator prevention strategies for triple-negative breast cancer in BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Review
- Metabolic Fingerprinting of Urine Reveals Metabolite Changes in Women With Breast Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Biological basis and clinical translation prospects of circulating cell-free DNA in precision management of breast cancer (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Comparison of High-Risk Breast Cancer Screenings with Concurrent Versus Staggered Breast MRI and Mammogram Schedules.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Insulin receptor expression and its association with hyperinsulinemia in triple negative breast cancer.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
- Retrospective evaluation of interval breast cancer screening mammograms by radiologists and AI.European radiology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for breast cancer prevention: the vision ahead.European radiology · 2026Review
- Results from a Swedish model-based analysis of the cost-effectiveness of AI-assisted digital mammography.European radiology · 2026Article
- The Urinary Proteome Differs with the Presence and Type of Breast Cancer.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
- The evaluation of artificial intelligence in mammography-based breast cancer screening: Is breast-level analysis enough?European radiology · 2025Article
- Breast Cancer Disparities in the LGBTQ + Community: How to Move Towards Inclusive Care from Screening to Survivorship.Current breast cancer reports · 2025Article
- Survival Benefits and Less Intensive Treatment for Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer Diagnosed While Participating in Population-Based Screening.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Thirty years of population-based breast cancer screening in Iceland: a comparison of quality indicators and tumour characteristics between women aged 40-49 and 50-69 years.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Article
- Mammographic classification of interval breast cancers and artificial intelligence performance.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Translating risk-based breast cancer screening to limited-resource settings.BMC global and public health · 2025Article
- Tumour growth rate and invasive interval cancer characteristics in a UK breast cancer screening population.European radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Breast cancer comprises a highly heterogeneous group of diseases. Many breast cancers, particularly the more lethal ones, may not satisfy the assumptions about biology and natural history of breast cancer necessary for screening mammography to be effective. Objectives: To compare tumor characteristics of breast cancers diagnosed within 2 years of a normal screening mammogram (interval breast cancer [IBC]) with those of screen-detected breast cancers (SBC) and to compare breast cancer-specific mortality of IBC with SBC. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this registry-based cohort study, we collected data about relevant tumor- and patient-related variables on women diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2004 and June 2010 who participated in the population-based screening program in Manitoba, Canada, and those diagnosed with breast cancer outside the screening program in the province. We performed multinomial logistic regression analysis to assess tumor and patient characteristics associated with a diagnosis of IBC compared with SBC. Competing risk analysis was performed to examine risk of death by cancer detection method. Exposures: Breast cancer diagnosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Differences in tumor characteristics and breast cancer-specific mortality. Results: A total of 69 025 women aged 50 to 64 years had 212 screening mammograms during the study period. There were 1687 breast cancer diagnoses (705 SBC, 206 IBC, 275 were noncompliant, and 501 were detected outside the screening program), and 225 deaths (170 breast cancer-specific deaths). Interval cancers were more likely than SBC to be of high grade and estrogen receptor negative (odds ratio [OR], 6.33; 95% CI, 3.73-10.75; P < .001; and OR, 2.88; 95% CI, 2.01-4.13; P < .001, respectively). After a median follow-up of 7 years, breast cancer-specific mortality was significantly higher for IBC compared with SBC cancers (hazard ratio [HR] 3.55; 95% CI, 2.01-6.28; P < .001), for a sojorn time of 2 years. Non-breast cancer mortality was similar between IBC and SBC (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.43-4.15). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, interval cancers were highly prevalent in women participating in population screening, represented a worse biology, and had a hazard for breast cancer death more than 3-fold that for SBC. Strategies beyond current mammographic screening practices are needed to reduce incidence, improve detection, and reduce deaths from these potentially lethal breast cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.