Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32975563›Full record

GuidelinePhysical therapy2021

Mobilization and Exercise Intervention for Patients With Multiple Myeloma: Clinical Practice Guidelines Endorsed by the Canadian Physiotherapy Association.

Deepa Jeevanantham, Venkadesan Rajendran, Zachary McGillis, Line Tremblay, Céline Larivière, Andrew Knight

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Physical therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07390071 (Multimodal Telerehabilitation in Patients Undergoing CAR-T Cell Immunotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07390071 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Multimodal Telerehabilitation in Patients Undergoing CAR-T Cell Immunotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2025 to 2029Enrolled40ConditionsLymphoma, Myeloma, Cytokine Release Syndrome, Immune Effector Cell Associated Neurotoxicity SyndromeArmsHome Automated Telemanagement (HAT) Patient Unit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Exercise interventions in patients with multiple myeloma: a scoping review.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Physical Activity in Multiple Myeloma: A Review of the Current Literature.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2023
    Review
  8. Psychosocial and supportive care needs of individuals with advanced myeloma.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2023
    Article
  9. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Deepa JeevananthamHealth Sciences North, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Venkadesan RajendranHealth Sciences North, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Zachary McGillisLaurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Line TremblayClinical Sciences Division, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Céline LarivièreMedical Sciences Division, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, School of Human Kinetics, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew KnightNorthern Ontario School of Medicine, School of Human Kinetics, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Laurentian University · CAHealth Sciences North · CANOSM University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIndividuals with multiple myeloma (MM) often have reduced functional performance due to the cancer itself or as a direct side effect of cancer treatments. Physical therapy is a part of cancer rehabilitation; however, no guidelines are available to provide information and direction for physical therapists managing patients with MM. The goal of this guideline is to provide recommendations based on a systematic review and consensus process that physical therapists can use to manage patients with MM.

methodsA systematic review of the literature published until August 2018 was performed in 8 databases with 2 independent reviewers assessing quality. Seventeen articles were identified as relevant, and a draft guideline was developed in the form of action statements. A total of 10 physical therapists with hematology experience and 10 patients with MM were recruited for consensus process. A priori threshold of 80% agreement was used to establish a consensus for each statement. The draft guidelines were reviewed externally by 4 methodologists using the AGREE II tool and a stakeholder representing OH (Cancer Care Ontario) Program in Evidence Based Care, McMaster University. The final guideline was reviewed and officially endorsed by the Canadian Physiotherapy Association.

resultsA total of 30 action statements were developed that achieved consensus, indicating physical therapy recommendations based on physiological markers (ie, hemoglobin, platelet count), complete patient presentation, and the stage of medical treatment.

conclusionThese clinical practice guidelines were developed to aid physical therapists in implementing evidence-based and best-practice care for patients with MM to optimize rehabilitation outcomes. IMPACT: These guidelines fill an important knowledge gap and are the first to provide information specifically for physical therapist management of patients with MM.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesCanadaCombined Modality TherapyEvidence-Based PracticeHumansMultiple MyelomaClinical GuidelinesExercise TherapyGuidelinesOncology

Identifiers

PMID32975563
PMCPMC7781094
OpenAlexW3088817136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.