Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32975552›Full record

SynthesisJAMA pediatrics2021

Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Children and Adolescents Compared With Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Russell M Viner, Oliver T Mytton, Chris Bonell, G J Melendez-Torres, Joseph Ward, Lee Hudson, Claire Waddington, James Thomas, Simon Russell, Fiona van der Klis and 6 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 544 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
544citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
218.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

544 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 893 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes among adults and children with moderate-to-severe asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. VIBES: A multiscale modeling approach integrating within-host and between-hosts dynamics in epidemics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

484 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Russell M VinerUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Oliver T MyttonMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Chris BonellLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
G J Melendez-TorresCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Joseph WardUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Lee HudsonUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Claire WaddingtonDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
James ThomasUCL Institute of Education, London, United Kingdom.
Simon RussellUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Fiona van der KlisNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Archana KoiralaUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Shamez LadhaniSt George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Jasmina Panovska-GriffithsDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nicholas G DaviesLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Robert BooyUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Rosalind M EggoLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Sydney · AUGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBMRC Epidemiology Unit · GBNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R00160X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The degree to which children and adolescents are infected by and transmit severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is unclear. The role of children and adolescents in transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is dependent on susceptibility, symptoms, viral load, social contact patterns, and behavior. Objective: To systematically review the susceptibility to and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among children and adolescents compared with adults. Data Sources: PubMed and medRxiv were searched from database inception to July 28, 2020, and a total of 13 926 studies were identified, with additional studies identified through hand searching of cited references and professional contacts. Study Selection: Studies that provided data on the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adolescents (younger than 20 years) compared with adults (20 years and older) derived from contact tracing or population screening were included. Single-household studies were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis: PRISMA guidelines for abstracting data were followed, which was performed independently by 2 reviewers. Quality was assessed using a critical appraisal checklist for prevalence studies. Random-effects meta-analysis was undertaken. Main Outcomes and Measures: Secondary infection rate (contact-tracing studies) or prevalence or seroprevalence (population screening studies) among children and adolescents compared with adults. Results: A total of 32 studies comprising 41 640 children and adolescents and 268 945 adults met inclusion criteria, including 18 contact-tracing studies and 14 population screening studies. The pooled odds ratio of being an infected contact in children compared with adults was 0.56 (95% CI, 0.37-0.85), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 94.6%). Three school-based contact-tracing studies found minimal transmission from child or teacher index cases. Findings from population screening studies were heterogenous and were not suitable for meta-analysis. Most studies were consistent with lower seroprevalence in children compared with adults, although seroprevalence in adolescents appeared similar to adults. Conclusions and Relevance: In this meta-analysis, there is preliminary evidence that children and adolescents have lower susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2, with an odds ratio of 0.56 for being an infected contact compared with adults. There is weak evidence that children and adolescents play a lesser role than adults in transmission of SARS-CoV-2 at a population level. This study provides no information on the infectivity of children.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19Disease SusceptibilityDisease Transmission, InfectiousFemaleHumansMaleRisk AssessmentSeroepidemiologic Studies

Identifiers

PMID32975552
PMCPMC7519436
OpenAlexW3088839942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.