Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32975528›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Integration Into Family Planning Services at Title X Clinics in the Southeastern United States: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Hybrid Type I Effectiveness Implementation Study (Phase 2 ATN 155).

Anandi N Sheth, Sophia A Hussen, Cam Escoffery, Lisa B Haddad, Leah Powell, Nakita Brown, Teresa R Filipowicz, Micah McCumber, Maria Sanchez, Laura Renshaw and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04097834 (Integrating PrEP Into Family Planning Services at Title X Clinics in the Southeastern US), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04097834 completednot on this map

Integrating PrEP Into Family Planning Services at Title X Clinics in the Southeastern US

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2019 to 2022Enrolled103ConditionsHIV Infections
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anandi N Sheth *Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6305-2727
Sophia A HussenDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5726-1637
Cam EscofferyDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4445-009X
Lisa B HaddadDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7631-6760
Leah PowellDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8555-2669
Nakita BrownDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6741-5521
Teresa R FilipowiczDepartment of Biostatistics, Collaborative Studies Coordinating Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5934-3217
Micah McCumberDepartment of Biostatistics, Collaborative Studies Coordinating Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2570-1180
Maria SanchezDepartment of Biostatistics, Collaborative Studies Coordinating Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5126-0257
Laura RenshawDepartment of Biostatistics, Collaborative Studies Coordinating Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2009-1686
Matthew A PsiodaDepartment of Biostatistics, Collaborative Studies Coordinating Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4450-6981
Jessica M SalesDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1571-8192
Emory University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Virology and Molecular Biomarkers CoreP30AI050409 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Carlos del Rio · 2002 to 2026
$74.0M
Project-003U24HD089880 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HUDGENS, MICHAEL G, LAVANGE, LISA · 2016 to 2021
$44.3M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050409NICHD NIH HHS U24 HD089880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescent and young adult women (AYAW), particularly racial and ethnic minorities, in the Southern United States are disproportionately affected by HIV. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective, scalable, individual-controlled HIV prevention strategy that is grossly underutilized among women of all ages and requires innovative delivery approaches to optimize its benefit. Anchoring PrEP delivery to family planning (FP) services that AYAW already trust, access routinely, and deem useful for their sexual health may offer an ideal opportunity to reach women at risk for HIV and to enhance their PrEP uptake and adherence. However, PrEP has not been widely integrated into FP services, including Title X-funded FP clinics that provide safety net sources of care for AYAW. To overcome potential implementation challenges for AYAW, Title X clinics in the Southern United States are uniquely positioned to be focal sites for conceptually informed and thoroughly evaluated PrEP implementation science studies.

objectiveThe objective of this study is two-fold: to evaluate multilevel factors associated with the level of PrEP adoption and implementation (eg, PrEP screening, counseling, and prescription) within and across 3 FP clinics and to evaluate PrEP uptake, persistence, and adherence among female patients in these clinics over a 6-month follow-up period.

methodsPhase 2 of Planning4PrEP (Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions 155) is a mixed methods hybrid type 1 effectiveness implementation study to be conducted in three clinics in Metro Atlanta, Georgia, United States. Guided by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment framework, this study will prepare clinics for PrEP integration via clinic-wide trainings and technical assistance and will develop clinic-specific PrEP implementation plans. We will monitor and evaluate PrEP implementation as well as female patient PrEP uptake, persistence, and adherence over a 6-month follow-up period.

resultsPhase 2 of Planning4PrEP research activities began in February 2018 and are ongoing. Qualitative data analysis is scheduled to begin in Fall 2020.

conclusionsThis study seeks to evaluate factors associated with the level of PrEP adoption and implementation (eg, PrEP screening, counseling, and prescription) within and across 3 FP clinics following training and implementation planning and to evaluate PrEP uptake, persistence, and adherence among female patients over a 6-month follow-up period. This will guide future strategies to support PrEP integration in Title X-funded clinics across the Southern United States.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04097834; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04097834. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/18784.

Indexed as

family planning servicesHIVimplementation sciencepre-exposure prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID32975528
PMCPMC7547391
OpenAlexW3048396634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.