Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32975453›Full record

ArticleDementia (London, England)2021

Partnerships in nursing homes: How do family caregivers of residents with dementia perceive collaboration with staff?

Linda Jm Hoek, Jolanda Cm van Haastregt, Erica de Vries, Ramona Backhaus, Jan Ph Hamers, Hilde Verbeek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Different views on collaboration between older persons, informal caregivers and care professionals.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Linda Jm HoekDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), 5211Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1596-2080
Jolanda Cm van HaastregtDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), 5211Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Erica de VriesDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), 5211Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Ramona BackhausDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), 5211Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Jan Ph HamersDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), 5211Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Hilde VerbeekDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), 5211Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPartnerships between family and nursing staff in nursing homes are essential to address residents' needs and wishes. Collaboration is needed to create partnerships; nonetheless, challenges exist.

aimThis study aimed to gain insights into the experiences of families collaborating with staff.

methodSemi-structured interviews were held with 30 family caregivers of nursing home residents with dementia.

findingsData reflected three themes, which shaped collaboration with staff from families' perspective, 'communication', 'trust and dependency' and 'involvement'. DISCUSSION: Good communication appeared to be a requisite condition for having trust in staff and quality of involvement in residents' life. Good communication was described as having informal contact with staff, which enabled family and staff to build a personal connection. Consequently, this seemed to increase trust and satisfaction regarding involvement.

conclusionFindings suggest that increasing informal contact and building a personal connection should be a priority for staff in order to improve collaboration and to create partnerships with families.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaNursing StaffCommunicationFamilyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNursing Homescommunicationdementiafamily caregivingnursing homepartnership

Identifiers

PMID32975453
PMCPMC8216310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.