Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32975194›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2021

The effects of COVID-19 stay-at-home order on sleep, health, and working patterns: a survey study of US health care workers.

Deirdre A Conroy, Nicole L Hadler, Echelle Cho, Aliya Moreira, Chamisa MacKenzie, Leslie M Swanson, Helen J Burgess, J Todd Arnedt, Cathy A Goldstein

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Combined effect of work from home and work during nonwork time on sleep disturbance.Annals of occupational and environmental medicine · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Deirdre A ConroyDepartment of Psychiatry, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Nicole L HadlerUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Echelle ChoUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Aliya MoreiraUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Chamisa MacKenzieDepartment of Psychiatry, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Leslie M SwansonDepartment of Psychiatry, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Helen J BurgessDepartment of Psychiatry, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
J Todd ArnedtDepartment of Psychiatry, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Cathy A GoldsteinDepartment of Neurology, Sleep Disorders Center, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Michigan Medicine · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesBy March 2020, COVID-19 forced much of the world to stay at home to reduce the spread of the disease. Whereas some health care workers transitioned to working from home, many continued to report to work in person as essential employees. We sought to explore changes in sleep, health, work, and mood in health care workers during the stay-at-home orders.

methodsWe developed a cross-sectional online survey administered to health care workers. The survey assessed changes in sleep, work, screen time, media exposure, diet, exercise, substance use, and mood. The survey data were collected between March 28, 2020, and April 29, 2020.

resultsA total of 834 of 936 individuals completed the entire survey. Respondents were from 41 US states. Mood after the stay-at-home orders worsened, and screen time and substance use increased. Total sleep time shortened in those continuing to work in person (P < .001), whereas it was unchanged in those working from home (P = .73). Those working from home went to bed later, woke up later, and worked fewer hours. Reduced total sleep time and increased screen time before bed were associated with worse mood and screen time. Longer sleep time was associated with better mood.

conclusionsHealth care workers' mood worsened regardless of whether work was in person or remote, although total sleep time was shorter for those working in person. Those working from home may have shifted their sleep time to be more in line with their endogenous circadian phase. Peer or other support services may be indicated to address sleep, mood, and health behaviors among health care workers during these unprecedented times.

Indexed as

Health StatusSleepAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude of Health PersonnelCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuarantineSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnairesalcohol useanxietycircadian timingCOVID-19depressionmoodscreen timesleep

Identifiers

PMID32975194
PMCPMC7853204
OpenAlexW3088026035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.