ArticleYonsei medical journal2020
Real-World Experience with Pembrolizumab Treatment in Patients with Heavily Treated Recurrent Gynecologic Malignancies.
Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rechallenge with Anti-PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients with Recurrent Gynecologic Malignancies.Yonsei medical journal · 2023Article
- Article
- Pembrolizumab in endometrial cancer: Where we stand now.Oncology letters · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe evaluated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent gynecologic cancers in real-world practice. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective, single-institution study of patients with recurrent gynecologic malignancies treated with pembrolizumab. The primary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) and safety.
resultsThirty-one patients treated with pembrolizumab were included. The primary disease sites were the uterine cervix (n=18), ovaries (n=8), and uterine corpus (n=5). Fifteen of the 31 patients (48%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≥2. The median number of prior chemotherapy lines was 2 (range, 1-6), and 14 of 31 patients (45%) had received ≥ 3 prior lines of chemotherapy. The overall ORR was 22.6%: specifically, 22.3% (4 of 18 patients), 12.5% (1 of 8 patients), and 40% (2 of 5 patients) for cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancers, respectively. During a median follow-up of 4.7 months (range, 0.2-35.3), the median time to response was 1.9 months (range, 1.4-5.7). The median duration of response was not reached (range, 8.8-not reached). The median progression-free survival was 2.5 months (95% confidence interval, 1.7-not reached). Adverse events occurred in 20 patients (64.5%), and only 3 (9.7%) were grade ≥3. There was one case of suspicious treatment-related mortality, apart from which most adverse events were manageable.
conclusionIn real-world practice, pembrolizumab was feasible and effective in heavily treated recurrent gynecologic cancer patients with poor performance status who may not be eligible for enrollment in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.