Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32974950›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pharmacology2021

Evaluation of the Relationship of Glasdegib Exposure and Safety End Points in Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors and Hematologic Malignancies.

Ana Ruiz-Garcia, Naveed Shaik, Swan Lin, Catriona Jamieson, Michael Heuser, Geoffrey Chan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Ruiz-GarciaPfizer Clinical Pharmacology, San Diego, California, USA.
Naveed ShaikPfizer Clinical Pharmacology, San Diego, California, USA.
Swan LinPfizer Clinical Pharmacology, San Diego, California, USA.
Catriona JamiesonMoores Cancer Center, University of California, La Jolla, California, USA.
Michael HeuserDepartment of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Geoffrey ChanPfizer Oncology, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Pfizer (United States) · USMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEMoores Cancer Center

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glasdegib is approved for treating acute myeloid leukemia in elderly patients at 100 mg once daily in combination with low-dose cytarabine. Exposure-efficacy analysis showed that the survival benefit of glasdegib was not glasdegib exposure-dependent. The relationship between glasdegib exposure and adverse event (AE) cluster terms of clinical concern was explored in this analysis. The incidence and severity of dysgeusia, muscle spasms, renal toxicity, and QT interval prolonged was modeled using ordinal logistic regression. AEs were graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03). Estimated pharmacokinetic parameters were used to derive glasdegib exposure metrics. Demographic characteristics, disease factors, and other variables of interest as potential moderators of safety signals were evaluated. Clinical trial data from patients who received single-agent glasdegib (N = 70; 5-640 mg once daily); or glasdegib (N = 202, 100-200 mg once daily) with low-dose cytarabine, decitabine, or daunorubicin and cytarabine were analyzed. Glasdegib exposure was statistically significantly associated with the cluster term safety end points dysgeusia, muscle spasms, renal toxicity, and QT interval prolonged. The impact of age on muscle spasms and baseline body weight and creatinine clearance on renal toxicity helped explain the AE grade distribution. At the 100 mg once daily clinical dose, the predicted probabilities of the highest AE grade were 11.3%, 6.7%, 7.7%, and 2.5% for dysgeusia, muscle spasms, renal toxicity, and QT interval prolonged, respectively. Overall, the predicted probability of developing an AE of any severity for these safety end points was low. Therefore, no starting dose adjustments are recommended for glasdegib based on the observed safety profile.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBenzimidazolesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHematologic NeoplasmsHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsBenzimidazolesglasdegibPhenylurea Compoundsacute myeloid leukemiaexposure-responsehedgehog signalingPK/PDsafetysmoothened inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID32974950
PMCPMC7891441
OpenAlexW3087868606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.