Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32974888›Full record

SynthesisEuropean geriatric medicine2020

Can probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics improve functional outcomes for older people: a systematic review.

L Coutts, K Ibrahim, Q Y Tan, S E R Lim, N J Cox, H C Roberts

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European geriatric medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Exploring the Relationship between the Gut Microbiota and Ageing: A Possible Age Modulator.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L CouttsAcademic Geriatric Medicine, Southampton General Hospital Mailpoint 807, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. l.coutts@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7927-2137
K IbrahimAcademic Geriatric Medicine, Southampton General Hospital Mailpoint 807, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5709-3867
Q Y TanAcademic Geriatric Medicine, Southampton General Hospital Mailpoint 807, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8317-7204
S E R LimAcademic Geriatric Medicine, Southampton General Hospital Mailpoint 807, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2496-2362
N J CoxAcademic Geriatric Medicine, Southampton General Hospital Mailpoint 807, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4297-1206
H C RobertsAcademic Geriatric Medicine, Southampton General Hospital Mailpoint 807, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5291-1880
Southampton General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeResearch evaluating the effect of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics (PPS) on laboratory markers of health (such as immunomodulatory and microbiota changes) is growing but it is unclear whether these markers translate to improved functional outcomes in the older population. This systematic review evaluates the effect of PPS on functional outcomes in older people.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of the effect of PPS in older adults on functional outcomes (physical strength, frailty, mood and cognition, mortality and receipt of care). Four electronic databases were searched for studies published since year 2000.

resultsEighteen studies (including 15 RCTs) were identified. One of five studies evaluating physical function reported benefit (improved grip strength). Two analyses of one prebiotic RCT assessed frailty by different methods with mixed results. Four studies evaluated mood with no benefit reported. Six studies evaluated cognition: four reported cognitive improvement in participants with pre-existing cognitive impairment receiving probiotics. Seven studies reported mortality as a secondary outcome with a trend to reduction in only one. Five studies reported length of hospital stay but only two peri-operative studies reported shorter stays.

conclusionThere is limited evidence that probiotics may improve cognition in older people with pre-existing cognitive impairment but no clear evidence of benefit of PPS on physical function, frailty, mood, length of hospitalisation and mortality. Larger studies with more homogenous interventions, accounting for confounding factors, such as diet, co-morbidities and medications, are required. There is currently inadequate evidence to recommend PPS use to older people in general. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO registration number is CRD42020173417. Date of PROSPERO registration: 01/05/20.

Indexed as

ProbioticsSynbioticsAgedCognitionHumansPrebioticsPrebioticsFunctional outcomesOlderPrebioticsProbioticsSynbiotics

Identifiers

PMID32974888
PMCPMC7515554
OpenAlexW3088960136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.