Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32974872›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2021

Development of an Offline-Friend Addiction Questionnaire (O-FAQ): Are most people really social addicts?

Liam P Satchell, Dean Fido, Craig A Harper, Heather Shaw, Brittany Davidson, David A Ellis, Claire M Hart, Rahul Jalil, Alice Jones Bartoli, Linda K Kaye and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. How much online pornography is too much? A comparison of two theoretically distinct assessment scales.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Absence of Objective Differences between Self-Identified Addicted and Healthy Smartphone Users?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Liam P SatchellDepartment of Psychology, University of Winchester, Sparkford Road, Winchester, Hampshire, SO22 4NR, UK. liam.satchell@winchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8805-4884
Dean FidoCollege of Business, Law and Social Sciences, University of Derby, Derby, UK.
Craig A HarperDepartment of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.
Heather ShawDepartment of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Brittany DavidsonDepartment of Computer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
David A EllisSchool of Management, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Claire M HartSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Rahul JalilDepartment of Psychology, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK.
Alice Jones BartoliDepartment of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, UK.
Linda K KayeDepartment of Psychology, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.
Gary L J LancasterDepartment of Psychology, University of Winchester, Sparkford Road, Winchester, Hampshire, SO22 4NR, UK.
Melissa PavetichSchool of Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, UK.
University of Winchester · GBBirmingham City University · GBEdge Hill University · GBGoldsmiths University of London · GBLancaster University · GBNottingham Trent University · GBUniversity of Bath · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Derby · GBUniversity of Greenwich · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing number of self-report measures aim to define interactions with social media in a pathological behavior framework, often using terminology focused on identifying those who are 'addicted' to engaging with others online. Specifically, measures of 'social media addiction' focus on motivations for online social information seeking, which could relate to motivations for offline social information seeking. However, it could be the case that these same measures could reveal a pattern of friend addiction in general. This study develops the Offline-Friend Addiction Questionnaire (O-FAQ) by re-wording items from highly cited pathological social media use scales to reflect "spending time with friends". Our methodology for validation follows the current literature precedent in the development of social media 'addiction' scales. The O-FAQ had a three-factor solution in an exploratory sample of N = 807 and these factors were stable in a 4-week retest (r = .72 to .86) and was validated against personality traits, and risk-taking behavior, in conceptually plausible directions. Using the same polythetic classification techniques as pathological social media use studies, we were able to classify 69% of our sample as addicted to spending time with their friends. The discussion of our satirical research is a critical reflection on the role of measurement and human sociality in social media research. We question the extent to which connecting with others can be considered an 'addiction' and discuss issues concerning the validation of new 'addiction' measures without relevant medical constructs. Readers should approach our measure with a level of skepticism that should be afforded to current social media addiction measures.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveSocial MediaFriendsHumansMotivationSurveys and QuestionnairesMeasurementSocial addictionSocial informationSocial media addictionSocial timeValidation

Identifiers

PMID32974872
OpenAlexW3080322494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.