Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32974856›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2020

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of low-dose rasburicase in critically ill children with haematological malignancies.

Yuxin Pei, Yu Li, Yujian Liang, Lingling Xu, Xueqiong Huang, Yijuan Li, Wen Tang, Xiaoyun Jiang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuxin PeiThe First Affiliated Hospital of Sun-yat, Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5000-8014
Yu LiThe First Affiliated Hospital of Sun-yat, Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Yujian LiangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Sun-yat, Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Lingling XuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Sun-yat, Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Xueqiong HuangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Sun-yat, Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Yijuan LiThe First Affiliated Hospital of Sun-yat, Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Wen TangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Sun-yat, Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Xiaoyun JiangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Sun-yat, Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China. jiangxiaoyun2015@126.com.
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The recommended dose of rasburicase is quite expensive, thus limiting its use. Whether a lower dose of rasburicase would be equally effective for critically ill children, who often have more complicated situations and a higher risk of hospital death, is still unknown. Objective To explore the safety and efficacy of low-dose rasburicase in critically ill children with haematological malignancies who are at high risk of tumour lysis syndrome. Setting A single-centre retrospective cohort study. Method Children with haematological malignancies who had a history of rasburicase exposure during an intensive care unit stay were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups according to the initial dosage of rasburicase: the standard-dose group (> 0.1 mg/kg/day) and the low-dose group (≤ 0.1 mg/kg/day). The adverse events and short-term prognosis of the two groups were compared. Results Thirty-seven children were selected, 22 in the standard-dose group and 15 in the low-dose group. The most common tumour type was Burkitt's lymphoma (81%), followed by acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (11%). All patients were at high risk of tumour lysis syndrome, and 73% of them had 3 or more tumour lysis syndrome risk factors. The uric acid levels of 90% of patients with hyperuricaemia returned to the normal range within 12 h (100% in the standard-dose group and 75% in the low-dose group, P = 0.083). Eighty-four percent of patients presented serious complications, including tumour lysis syndrome (73%), acute kidney injury (59%), renal replacement treatment (24%), respiratory failure (24%), disseminated intravascular coagulation (16%) and heart failure (11%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of serious complications between the two groups. The overall 7-day and 28-day survival rates after intensive care unit admission were 86% and 84%, respectively. The average length of stay in the intensive care unit was 9.92 ± 5.13 days. Neither the short-term mortality nor the length of stay in the intensive care unit were significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion Low-dose rasburicase is effective and may be an acceptable choice for critically ill children with haematological malignancies.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAntineoplastic AgentsChildChild, PreschoolCritical IllnessFemaleGout SuppressantsHematologic NeoplasmsHospital MortalityHumansHyperuricemiaIntensive Care Units, PediatricLength of StayMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentAntineoplastic AgentsGout SuppressantsrasburicaseUrate OxidaseChildrenHaematological malignanciesHyperuricaemiaIntensive care unitRasburicase

Identifiers

PMID32974856
PMCPMC7603475
OpenAlexW3088474279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.