Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32974775›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2021

Coronally advanced flap achieved higher esthetic outcomes without a connective tissue graft for the treatment of single gingival recessions: a 4-year randomized clinical trial.

Stephany Gil, Manuel de la Rosa, Evelyn Mancini, Antonio Dias, Shayan Barootchi, Lorenzo Tavelli, Gerardo Mendoza-Azpur

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Stephany GilDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Universidad Científica del Sur, Calle Cantuarias 398, Miraflores, 15074, Lima, Peru.
Manuel de la RosaDepartment of Periodontics, AME University Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico.
Evelyn ManciniPrivate Practice, Rosario, Argentina.
Antonio DiasDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Universidad Científica del Sur, Calle Cantuarias 398, Miraflores, 15074, Lima, Peru.
Shayan BarootchiDepartment of Periodontics & Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Lorenzo TavelliDepartment of Periodontics & Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4864-3964
Gerardo Mendoza-AzpurDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Universidad Científica del Sur, Calle Cantuarias 398, Miraflores, 15074, Lima, Peru. gmendoza@ucientifica.edu.pe.
Universidad Científica del Sur · PEUniversity of Michigan · USCentro Científico Tecnólogico - Rosario · ARTecnológico de Monterrey · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesLimited long-term data are available when comparing the esthetic outcomes of coronally advanced flap (CAF) with or without a connective tissue graft (CTG). The aim of this study was to compare the 4-year esthetic outcomes of CAF vs CAF + CTG for the treatment of isolated maxillary gingival recessions. MATERIAL AND

methodsForty-eight patients were randomly assigned for treatment either with CAF (control; N = 24) or to CAF + CTG (test group; N = 24). Patients were followed after the surgery until the final evaluation. A professional esthetic evaluation was performed using the Root coverage Esthetic Score (RES). Recession reduction, mean root coverage, and complete root coverage were also evaluated.

resultsForty-two patients completed the study at the 4-year recall. A significant recession reduction was evident at 4 years, without significant intergroup differences. The CAF group showed a statistically significant higher final RES compared with the CAF + CTG group (9.14 ± 1.08 vs 7.25 ± 1.29, respectively, p < 0.001). Regarding the individual components of RES, gingival margin and marginal tissue contour were significantly higher in the CAF group compared with that in the CAF + CTG group.

conclusionsCAF presented with a significantly higher overall esthetic score than CAF + CTG, and in the individual RES components of marginal tissue contour and gingival margin after 4 years. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CAF without the addition of CTG provided higher esthetic outcomes for the treatment of isolated gingival recessions.

Indexed as

Gingival RecessionConnective TissueEsthetics, DentalFollow-Up StudiesGingivaHumansPeriodontal Attachment LossTooth RootTreatment OutcomeConnective tissue graftEstheticsGingival recessionSurgical flapsTooth root

Identifiers

PMID32974775
OpenAlexW3089018282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.