Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32974748›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2021

Ceftriaxone dosing in patients admitted from the emergency department with sepsis.

Aaron J Heffernan, Rebecca A Curran, Kerina J Denny, Fekade B Sime, Claire L Stanford, Brett McWhinney, Jacobus Ungerer, Jason A Roberts, Jeffrey Lipman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Antibiotic therapy for bacterial pneumonia.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Ceftriaxone 1 g Versus 2 g Daily for the Treatment of Enterobacterales Bacteremia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aaron J HeffernanSchool of Medicine, Griffith University, Southport, Australia. aaron.heffernan@griffithuni.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7929-9812
Rebecca A CurranDepartment of Pharmacy, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Australia.
Kerina J DennyDepartment of Intensive Care, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Australia.
Fekade B SimeCentre for Translational Anti-Infective Pharmacodynamics, School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Australia.
Claire L StanfordDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Australia.
Brett McWhinneyDepartment of Chemical Pathology, Pathology Queensland, Herston, Australia.
Jacobus UngererDepartment of Chemical Pathology, Pathology Queensland, Herston, Australia.
Jason A RobertsCentre for Translational Anti-Infective Pharmacodynamics, School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Australia.
Jeffrey LipmanUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUnbound ceftriaxone pharmacokinetics in adult patients have been poorly characterised. The objective of this study is to determine the ceftriaxone dose that achieves an unbound trough concentration ≥ 0.5 mg/L in > 90% of adult patients receiving once-daily dosing presenting to the emergency department (ED) with sepsis.

methodsWe performed a prospective single-centre pharmacokinetic study. A single unbound plasma ceftriaxone concentration was obtained from each patient using blood collected as part of routine clinical practice within the first dosing interval. Samples were analysed using a validated ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography method. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulations (n = 1000) were performed using Pmetrics for R.

resultsA ceftriaxone concentration obtained throughout the first dosing interval was available for fifty adult patients meeting sepsis criteria. Using this concentration time-curve data, a pharmacokinetic model was developed with acceptable predictive performance per the visual predictive check. Simulations show that a 1-g once-daily dose is unlikely to achieve the minimum therapeutic ceftriaxone exposure in > 90% patients with a creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min. However, a 2-g once-daily dose will provide a therapeutic exposure for target pathogens infecting patients with a creatinine clearance ≤ 140 mL/min.

conclusionsCeftriaxone administered as a 1-g once-daily dose is unlikely to achieve a therapeutic exposure in > 90% of patients presenting to the ED with sepsis. Increasing the ceftriaxone dose to 2 g once daily will likely achieve the desired exposure against target pathogens. Future clinical trials are required to determine any potential clinical benefit of optimised ceftriaxone dosing.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftriaxoneCritical IllnessDrug Administration ScheduleEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalMonte Carlo MethodPatient AdmissionProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftriaxoneCeftriaxoneDosePharmacokineticsSepsis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.