Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32974726›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2021

True Choice in Reproductive Care: Using Cultural Humility and Explanatory Models to Support Reproductive Justice in Primary Care.

Megha Shankar, Meagan Williams, Adelaide Hearst McClintock

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Shared Decision Making in Perinatal Care.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Megha ShankarVA Palo Alto Health Care System Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), Menlo Park, CA, USA. meghs@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5230-372X
Meagan WilliamsDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Adelaide Hearst McClintockDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reproductive justice is the human right to maintain personal bodily autonomy, have children, not have children, and to parent children in safe and sustainable communities. Historically, marginalized individuals have experienced reproductive oppression in multiple forms. This oppression continues in modern times through health policy and patient-clinician communication. To combat this, the framework of reproductive justice outlines four key actions: analyzing power systems, addressing intersecting oppressions, centering the most marginalized, and joining together across issues and identities. Primary care clinicians have a unique role and responsibility to carry out these four key actions in order to provide patient centered reproductive care. To translate reproductive justice into clinical practice, clinicians care can use reflective practice, the framework of cultural humility, and the concepts from the explanatory model of illness.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersSocial JusticeChildHuman RightsHumansPatient-Centered CarePersonal Autonomy

Identifiers

PMID32974726
PMCPMC7514230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.