Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32974688›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Fully automated detection of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)-compatible bile duct changes based on 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using machine learning.

Kristina I Ringe, Van Dai Vo Chieu, Frank Wacker, Henrike Lenzen, Michael P Manns, Christian Hundt, Bertil Schmidt, Hinrich B Winther

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: Diagnostic Criteria.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Artificial Intelligence in Hepatology- Ready for the Primetime.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristina I RingeDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. ringe.kristina@mh-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0315-135X
Van Dai Vo ChieuDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Frank WackerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Henrike LenzenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122, Essen, Germany.
Michael P MannsDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Christian HundtNVIDIA AI Tech Center, Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust, Université du Luxembourg, 29, avenue JF Kennedy, L-1855, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Bertil SchmidtInstitute for Computer Science, Johannes Gutenberg University, Saarstraße 21, 55122, Mainz, Germany.
Hinrich B WintherDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity of Luxembourg · LU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop and evaluate a deep learning algorithm for fully automated detection of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)-compatible cholangiographic changes on three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (3D-MRCP) images.

methodsThe datasets of 428 patients (n = 205 with confirmed diagnosis of PSC; n = 223 non-PSC patients) referred for MRI including MRCP were included in this retrospective IRB-approved study. Datasets were randomly assigned to a training (n = 386) and a validation group (n = 42). For each case, 20 uniformly distributed axial MRCP rotations and a subsequent maximum intensity projection (MIP) were calculated, resulting in a training database of 7720 images and a validation database of 840 images. Then, a pre-trained Inception ResNet was implemented which was conclusively fine-tuned (learning rate 10

resultsApplying an ensemble strategy (by binning of the 20 axial projections), the mean absolute error (MAE) of the developed deep learning algorithm for detection of PSC-compatible cholangiographic changes was lowered from 21 to 7.1%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for detection of these changes were 95.0%, 90.9%, 90.5%, and 95.2% respectively.

conclusionsThe results of this study demonstrate the feasibility of transfer learning in combination with extensive image augmentation to detect PSC-compatible cholangiographic changes on 3D-MRCP images with a high sensitivity and a low MAE. Further validation with more and multicentric data is now desirable, as it is known that neural networks tend to overfit the characteristics of the dataset. KEY POINTS: • The described machine learning algorithm is able to detect PSC-compatible cholangiographic changes on 3D-MRCP images with high accuracy. • The generation of 2D projections from 3D datasets enabled the implementation of an ensemble strategy to boost inference performance.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic ResonanceCholangitis, SclerosingBile DuctsCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesCholangiographyDeep learningMachine learningSclerosing cholangitis

Identifiers

PMID32974688
OpenAlexW3088337432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.