Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32974660›Full record

SynthesisNutrition reviews2021

Energy expenditure during pregnancy: a systematic review.

Claudia Savard, Audrée Lebrun, Sarah O'Connor, Bénédicte Fontaine-Bisson, François Haman, Anne-Sophie Morisset

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrition reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Birth Weight in the Daasanach Community of Northern Kenya and the Effect of Multiparity.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Physical Activity and Pregnancy Norms Among Daasanach Semi-Nomadic Pastoralist Women in Northern Kenya.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2025
    Article
  8. Feasibility and user acceptability of BreezingSmart health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The obstetrical dilemma hypothesis: there's life in the old dog yet.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claudia SavardSchool of Nutrition, Laval University, Quebec, Canada; CHU of Quebec-Laval University Research Center, Quebec, Canada.
Audrée LebrunSchool of Nutrition, Laval University, Quebec, Canada; CHU of Quebec-Laval University Research Center, Quebec, Canada.
Sarah O'ConnorSchool of Nutrition, Laval University, Quebec, Canada; CHU of Quebec-Laval University Research Center, Quebec, Canada.
Bénédicte Fontaine-BissonSchool of Nutrition, Laval University, Quebec, Canada; CHU of Quebec-Laval University Research Center, Quebec, Canada.
François HamanSchool of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Anne-Sophie MorissetSchool of Nutrition, Laval University, Quebec, Canada; CHU of Quebec-Laval University Research Center, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

CIHR GSD-167043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextContrary to nutritional guidelines, accumulating evidence shows that pregnant women's energy intakes remain stable throughout trimesters. Although pregnant women may eat below their needs or underreport their energy intakes, it is also relevant to question how energy requirements - estimated through measurements of energy expenditure (EE) - change throughout pregnancy.

objectiveThis review examined prospective studies that measured EE during pregnancy, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. DATA SOURCES: PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched to identify relevant publications up to November 14, 2019. STUDY SELECTION: All studies that measured EE prospectively and objectively during pregnancy were included in this systematic review. Two authors independently screened 4852 references. A total of 32 studies were included in the final analysis. DATA EXTRACTION: One author extracted data and assessed the risk of bias and a second author did so for a random sample of studies (n = 7; 22%). DATA ANALYSIS: Increases in resting EE ranged from 0.5% to 18.3% (8-239 kcal), from 3.0% to 24.1% (45-327 kcal), and from 6.4% to 29.6% (93-416 kcal) between early and mid-, mid- and late, and early and late pregnancy, respectively. Increases in total EE ranged from 4.0% to 17.7% (84-363 kcal), from 0.2% to 30.2% (5-694 kcal), and from 7.9% to 33.2% (179-682 kcal) between early and mid-, mid- and late, and early and late pregnancy, respectively. Participants were mainly of normal weight, although many studies did not report important covariates such as prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain adequacy.

conclusionsAdditional high-quality longitudinal studies (ie, with multiple objective measurements of EE in all periods of pregnancy while considering important confounding variables, like gestational weight gain) are required.

Indexed as

Energy MetabolismMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaFemaleHumansPregnancyenergy expenditureenergy intakeenergy needsenergy requirementspregnancy

Identifiers

PMID32974660
PMCPMC7947828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.