Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32974309›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020

Integration of Genetic and Process Engineering for Optimized Rhamnolipid Production Using

Till Tiso, Nina Ihling, Sonja Kubicki, Andreas Biselli, Andreas Schonhoff, Isabel Bator, Stephan Thies, Tobias Karmainski, Sebastian Kruth, Anna-Lena Willenbrink and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Heterologous rhamnolipid biosynthesis byApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Genome-ReducedEngineering in life sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Recent fermentation developments for improved rhamnolipid production.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. High-quality physiology ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Till TisoiAMB - Institute of Applied Microbiology, ABBt - Aachen Biology and Biotechnology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Nina IhlingBioeconomy Science Center (BioSC), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Sonja KubickiBioeconomy Science Center (BioSC), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Andreas BiselliBioeconomy Science Center (BioSC), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Andreas SchonhoffBioeconomy Science Center (BioSC), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Isabel BatoriAMB - Institute of Applied Microbiology, ABBt - Aachen Biology and Biotechnology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Stephan ThiesBioeconomy Science Center (BioSC), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Tobias KarmainskiiAMB - Institute of Applied Microbiology, ABBt - Aachen Biology and Biotechnology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Sebastian KruthiAMB - Institute of Applied Microbiology, ABBt - Aachen Biology and Biotechnology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Anna-Lena WillenbrinkBioeconomy Science Center (BioSC), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Anita LoeschckeBioeconomy Science Center (BioSC), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Petra ZappBioeconomy Science Center (BioSC), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Andreas JupkeBioeconomy Science Center (BioSC), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Karl-Erich JaegerBioeconomy Science Center (BioSC), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Jochen BüchsBioeconomy Science Center (BioSC), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Lars M BlankiAMB - Institute of Applied Microbiology, ABBt - Aachen Biology and Biotechnology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Forschungszentrum Jülich · DERWTH Aachen University · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhamnolipids are biosurfactants produced by microorganisms with the potential to replace synthetic compounds with petrochemical origin. To promote industrial use of rhamnolipids, recombinant rhamnolipid production from sugars needs to be intensified. Since this remains challenging, the aim of the presented research is to utilize a multidisciplinary approach to take a step toward developing a sustainable rhamnolipid production process. Here, we developed expression cassettes for stable integration of the rhamnolipid biosynthesis genes into the genome outperformed plasmid-based expression systems. Furthermore, the genetic stability of the production strain was improved by using an inducible promoter. To enhance rhamnolipid synthesis, energy- and/or carbon-consuming traits were removed: mutants negative for the synthesis of the flagellar machinery or the storage polymer PHA showed increased production by 50%. Variation of time of induction resulted in an 18% increase in titers. A scale-up from shake flasks was carried out using a 1-L bioreactor. By recycling of the foam, biomass loss could be minimized and a rhamnolipid titer of up to 1.5 g/L was achieved without using mechanical foam destroyers or antifoaming agents. Subsequent liquid-liquid extraction was optimized by using a suitable minimal medium during fermentation to reduce undesired interphase formation. A technical-scale production process was designed and evaluated by a life-cycle assessment (LCA). Different process chains and their specific environmental impact were examined. It was found that next to biomass supply, the fermentation had the biggest environmental impact. The present work underlines the need for multidisciplinary approaches to address the challenges associated with achieving sustainable production of microbial secondary metabolites. The results are discussed in the context of the challenges of microbial biosurfactant production using hydrophilic substrates on an industrial scale.

Indexed as

environmental impactlife cycle assessmentliquid–liquid extractionmetabolic engineeringoxygen transfer ratePseudomonas putida KT2440rhamnolipidssynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID32974309
PMCPMC7468518
OpenAlexW3080334985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.