Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32974094›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

Omics approaches in

Kiran Khandagale, Ram Krishna, Praveen Roylawar, Avinash B Ade, Ashwini Benke, Bharat Shinde, Major Singh, Suresh J Gawande, Ashutosh Rai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Assessment of salinity tolerance in onion (Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Green Onion (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Welsh Onion (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kiran KhandagaleDepartment of Botany, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Ram KrishnaICAR-Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research, Rajgurunagar, India.
Praveen RoylawarDepartment of Botany, S. N. Arts, D. J. M. Commerce and B. N. S. Science College, Sangamner, India.
Avinash B AdeDepartment of Botany, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Ashwini BenkeICAR-Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research, Rajgurunagar, India.
Bharat ShindeVidya Pratishthans's Arts Science and commerce college, Baramati, India.
Major SinghICAR-Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research, Rajgurunagar, India.
Suresh J GawandeICAR-Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research, Rajgurunagar, India.
Ashutosh RaiCrop Improvement, ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe genus

methodIn the present review, major omics approaches, and their progress, as well as potential applications in Allium crops, could be discussed in detail.

resultsHere, we have discussed the recent progress made in

conclusionAll the information and literature provided in the present review throws light on the progress and potential of omics platforms in the research of

Indexed as

AlliumGenomicsMetabolomicsMetagenomicsMicrornaProteomicsTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID32974094
PMCPMC7486827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.