Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32974001›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in psychopharmacology2020

Rates and correlates of pharmacotherapy-related problems among psychiatric inpatients: a representative Danish study.

Karina Porsborg Kibsdal, Sabina Andersen, Parisa Gazerani, Hanne Plet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Surveying Child and Adolescent Inpatient Psychiatric Units: Demographics, Policies, and Practice.Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karina Porsborg KibsdalHospital Pharmacy of North Denmark Region, Aalborg, Denmark.
Sabina AndersenHospital Pharmacy of North Denmark Region, Aalborg, Denmark.
Parisa GazeraniLaboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 5B, Aalborg E, 9220, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0109-3600
Hanne PletResearch and Development, Pharmacist, Hospital Pharmacy of North Denmark Region, Porsvej 1, Aalborg, 9000, Denmark.
North Denmark Region · DKAalborg University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug related problems (DRPs) occur frequently among psychiatric patients due to common prescribing errors and complex treatment schedules. Clinical pharmacists (CPs) are thought to play an important role in preventing DRPs and, consequently, to increasing the quality of inpatient care. There is, however, limited information available on DRPs within the psychiatric field in Denmark. The aim of this study was to identify rates and correlates of pharmacotherapy-related problems among psychiatric inpatients in a Danish psychiatric hospital.

methodsA retrospective descriptive study was conducted by two CPs and data were obtained from the medical records available in two psychiatric wards. Chart-reviews were conducted for the period of June 2015 to February 2017. The analyses focussed on the prevalence of DRP categories, implementation and acceptance rates, and drugs associated with the DRPs. Extracted data were discussed with the wards' physicians and registered in a DRP-database.

resultsIn total, 607 medical records were reviewed and, on average, 2.5 DRPs per medication review were found. There was a positive correlation between the number prescribed drugs and the average number of DRPs. The most frequent categories of DRPs were 'drug dosage', 'inappropriate drug' and 'interactions'. The drugs represented most frequently in DRPs were olanzapine, quetiapine and pantoprazole. The overall acceptance rate was 49% with 33% of those implemented clinically.

conclusionDRPs were commonly observed among psychiatric patients, particularly in those with multiple prescriptions, in relation to drugs dosage, inappropriate prescriptions and drug interactions. Particular attention must be paid to olanzapine, quetiapine and pantoprazole. Strategies to minimise DRPs among psychiatric patients are warranted and CPs can play an important role.

Indexed as

clinical pharmacyDenmarkdrug related problemsmedication reviewpsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID32974001
PMCPMC7491228
OpenAlexW3085275064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.