Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32973975›Full record

ReviewDementia & neuropsychologia

Challenges in dementia care: comparing key issues from Brazil and the United Kingdom.

Helen Durgante, Milena Lucía Contreras, Tamara Backhouse, Angelique Mavrodaris, Michele Gomes Ferreira, Debora Lee Vianna Paulo, Marcus Vinicius Alves, Larissa da Silva Serelli, Leonardo Cruz de Souza, Naoko Kishita

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dementia & neuropsychologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and the risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Helen DurganteDepartamento de Psiquiatria, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2044-6865
Milena Lucía ContrerasSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia - Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5171-0534
Tamara BackhouseSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia - Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8194-4174
Angelique MavrodarisCambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge - Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Michele Gomes FerreiraFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6697-3655
Debora Lee Vianna PauloFaculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9532-6860
Marcus Vinicius AlvesDepartamento de Psicobiologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5179-3771
Larissa da Silva SerelliFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1977-7165
Leonardo Cruz de SouzaFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5027-9722
Naoko KishitaSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia - Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8453-2714

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The United Kingdom-Brazil Dementia Workshop took place in July 2019 in the city of Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, with an interdisciplinary group of health and care professionals from the United Kingdom and from Brazil to address challenges in diagnosis, public perception and care of dementia. The aim of this article is to present the results identified in relation to challenges in the care of dementia, including recommendations that could potentially guide local and State/Municipal authorities and care services for people with dementia in the future. Four key issues were prioritised to identify challenges and generate possible solutions in Brazil and the United Kingdom: I) limitations of current health systems; II) continuous and long-term support for family carers (pre-diagnosis, mourning); III) support for people with advanced dementia and end-of-life care; IV) support for people with young-onset dementia. In both countries, carers feel left without post-diagnostic support; information on the progression of dementia is lacking and some people do not even have a specific diagnosis; encouraging and providing training for carers best manage some of the symptoms is imperative; preparation for end of life care and support carers after the death of their loved ones remains highly needed; strengthening services and qualification of health professionals, also creating protocols to guide dementia-related services represent a common challenge to overcome. The authors outline recommendations according to the issues identified to assist future formulation of adequate policies and services for people with dementia and carers.

Indexed as

cross-cultural comparisondementiahealth carehealthcare systemshealth programs and plans

Identifiers

PMID32973975
PMCPMC7500811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.