Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32973973›Full record

ReviewDementia & neuropsychologia

Challenges in the diagnosis of dementia: insights from the United Kingdom-Brazil Dementia Workshop.

Victor Calil, Emma Elliott, Wyllians Vendramini Borelli, Breno José Alencar Pires Barbosa, Jessyka Bram, Felipe de Oliveira Silva, Leonardo Galvão Machado Cardoso, Luciano Inácio Mariano, Natalia Dias, Michael Hornberger and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dementia & neuropsychologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Inequities in Dementia Diagnosis: Evidence From the ELSI-Brazil Study.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Victor CalilInstituto D'Or de Ensino e Pesquisa - Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1389-2445
Emma ElliottInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow - Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4323-9308
Wyllians Vendramini BorelliFaculdade de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9282-0601
Breno José Alencar Pires BarbosaInstituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira - Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4333-2024
Jessyka BramLaboratório de Neurociências, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Universidade de São Paulo - São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1325-1450
Felipe de Oliveira SilvaInstituto de Psiquiatria, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1457-0480
Leonardo Galvão Machado CardosoFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal da Bahia - Salvador, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9715-4951
Luciano Inácio MarianoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Neurociências, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0192-534X
Natalia DiasLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Investigação Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9006-3643
Michael HornbergerNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia - Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2214-3788
Paulo CaramelliDepartamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4786-6990

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In July 2019, a group of multidisciplinary dementia researchers from Brazil and the United Kingdom (UK) met in the city of Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, to discuss and propose solutions to current challenges faced in the diagnosis, public perception and care of dementia. Here we summarize the outcomes from the workshop addressing challenges in diagnosis. Brazil faces a major problem in dementia underdiagnosis, particularly involving the population in an adverse socioeconomic context. There is poor availability of resources and specialists, and the knowledge of general practitioners and other healthcare professionals is far from satisfactory. Low education level is a further obstacle in diagnosing dementia, as the most commonly used screening tests are not designed to evaluate this population. Patients and their families must overcome the stigma of a diagnosis of dementia, which is still prevalent in Brazil and increases the burden of this condition. Whilst the UK has greater resources, dedicated memory services and a National Dementia Strategy plan, the National Health Service (NHS) has limited funding. Therefore, some challenges regarding diagnosis are common across both countries. The authors suggest possible solutions to confront these, with the goal of improving assessment and recognition of dementia and reducing misdiagnosis.

Indexed as

biomarkerscognitive impairmentdementiadiagnosisneurobehavioral manifestations

Identifiers

PMID32973973
PMCPMC7500814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.