ArticleOncology letters2020
Patterns of recurrence in patients with curative resected rectal cancer according to different chemoradiotherapy strategies: Does preoperative chemoradiotherapy lower the risk of peritoneal recurrence?
Article in Oncology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aimed to compare the pattern of distant recurrence between patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer treated with pre-operative (OP) and those treated with post-operative (post-OP) chemoradiotherapy (CRT). A total of 631 patients with newly diagnosed non-metastatic rectal cancer who had received pre-OP or post-OP CRT with curative intent surgery between August 2008 and April 2015 were identified. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed to account for baseline differences between the two arms. Overall, 449 and 182 patients were treated with pre-OP and post-OP CRT, respectively. Sex, tumor location, clinical tumor stage, CRT regimen and adjuvant chemotherapy regimen were significantly different between the two arms. The median follow-up duration was 55.4 months (range, 53.7-57.1). The 5-year distant recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were not significantly different between the pre-OP and post-OP CRT arms (RFS, 67.5 vs. 71.6%, P=0.595 and OS, 81.9 vs. 77.0%, P=0.449), and no difference was observed in the distant recurrence patterns. Following IPTW, there was still no difference in distant RFS (pre-OP vs. post-OP CRT; hazard ratio (HR)=0.62; P=0.911), but pre-OP CRT was significantly associated with lower peritoneal recurrence (pre-OP vs. post-OP CRT; HR, 0.13; P=0.032). In addition, there was no significant difference in OS between the two arms (pre-OP vs. post-OP CRT; HR, 0.85; P=0.665). In conclusion, although distant RFS was not significantly different between the two arms, pre-OP CRT was significantly associated with a lower risk of peritoneal recurrence than post-OP CRT in patients non-metastatic rectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.