Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32973894›Full record

ReviewRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2020

[Prevention and control of antimicrobial stewardship: a review of evidenceGestión de las intervenciones en materia de prevención y control de la resistencia a los antimicrobianos en los hospitales: revisión de la evidencia].

Roberta Crevelário de Melo, Bruna Carolina de Araújo, Maritsa Carla de Bortoli, Tereza Setsuko Toma

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roberta Crevelário de MeloSecretaria de Estado de Saúde, Instituto de Saúde, Centro de Tecnologias de Saúde para o SUS São Paulo (SP) Brasil Secretaria de Estado de Saúde, Instituto de Saúde, Centro de Tecnologias de Saúde para o SUS, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Bruna Carolina de AraújoSecretaria de Estado de Saúde, Instituto de Saúde, Centro de Tecnologias de Saúde para o SUS São Paulo (SP) Brasil Secretaria de Estado de Saúde, Instituto de Saúde, Centro de Tecnologias de Saúde para o SUS, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Maritsa Carla de BortoliSecretaria de Estado de Saúde, Instituto de Saúde, Centro de Tecnologias de Saúde para o SUS São Paulo (SP) Brasil Secretaria de Estado de Saúde, Instituto de Saúde, Centro de Tecnologias de Saúde para o SUS, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Tereza Setsuko TomaSecretaria de Estado de Saúde, Instituto de Saúde, Centro de Tecnologias de Saúde para o SUS São Paulo (SP) Brasil Secretaria de Estado de Saúde, Instituto de Saúde, Centro de Tecnologias de Saúde para o SUS, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify effective interventions to manage antimicrobial resistance in hospital settings and potential barriers to their implementation.

methodA synthesis of evidence for health policy was performed using SUPPORT tools. Literature searches were performed in November and December 2018 in 14 databases. A face-to-face deliberative dialogue workshop to identify implementation barriers was performed with 23 participants (manager, researchers, and health care professionals) and 14 listeners divided into three groups. Researchers with experience in deliberative dialogue acted as facilitators.

resultsTwenty-seven systematic reviews focusing on antimicrobial stewardship using combined or individual strategies were identified. The interventions included education, electronic systems, use of biomarkers, and several strategies of antimicrobial management. The main barriers to the implementation of interventions, identified in the literature and deliberative dialogue workshop, were poor infrastructure and insufficient human resources, patient complaints regarding the treatment received, cultural differences within the multidisciplinary team, work overload, and lack of financing/planning.

conclusionMost of the strategies identified were effective for antimicrobial stewardship in hospital settings. The reliability of results may be strengthened with the performance of additional research of higher methodological quality.

Indexed as

antimicrobial stewardshipDrug resistance, microbialevidence-informed policyhospitals

Identifiers

PMID32973894
PMCPMC7498289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.