Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32973802›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2020

Effector CD8 T Cell-Dependent Zika Virus Control in the CNS: A Matter of Time and Numbers.

Loulieta Nazerai, Amalie Skak Schøller, Maria Rosaria Bassi, Søren Buus, Anette Stryhn, Jan Pravsgaard Christensen, Allan Randrup Thomsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. CD8Npj viruses · 2024
    Article
  8. Slc43a2Science China. Life sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Characterization of CD8Journal of virology · 2024
    Article
  10. Vaccine induced memory CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Decidual NK cells kill Zika virus-infected trophoblasts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Loulieta NazeraiDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Amalie Skak SchøllerDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maria Rosaria BassiDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Søren BuusDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anette StryhnDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jan Pravsgaard ChristensenDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Allan Randrup ThomsenDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV), a mosquito-borne flavivirus, came into the spotlight in 2016 when it was found to be associated with an increased rate of microcephalic newborns in Brazil. The virus has further been recognized to cause neurologic complications in children and adults in the form of myelitis, encephalitis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) and Guillain Barre Syndrome in a fraction of infected individuals. With the ultimate goal of identifying correlates of protection to guide the design of an effective vaccine, the study of the immune response to ZIKV infection has become the focus of research worldwide. Both innate and adaptive immune responses seem to be essential for controlling the infection. Induction of sufficient levels of neutralizing antibodies has been strongly correlated with protection against reinfection in various models, while the role of CD8 T cells as antiviral effectors in the CNS has been controversial. In an attempt to improve our understanding regarding the role of ZIKV-induced CD8 T cells in protective immunity inside the CNS, we have expanded on previous studies in intracranially infected mice. In a recent study, we have demonstrated that, peripheral ZIKV infection in adult C57BL/6 mice induces a robust CD8 T cell response that peaks within a week. In the present study, we used B cell deficient as well as wild-type mice to show that there is a race between CXCR3-dependent recruitment of the effector CD8 T cells and local ZIKV replication, and that CD8 T cells are capable of local viral control if they arrive in the brain early after viral invasion, in appropriate numbers and differentiation state. Our data highlight the benefits of considering this subset when designing vaccines against Zika virus.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersBrainCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCentral Nervous System Viral DiseasesDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHost-Pathogen InteractionsImmunizationImmunophenotypingLymphocyte CountLymphocyte DepletionMiceMice, KnockoutViral LoadZika VirusBiomarkersadaptive immunityB cellsmemorymouse modelprotectionT cellsZika virus

Identifiers

PMID32973802
PMCPMC7461798
OpenAlexW3051641794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.