ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2020
You Can't
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antimicrobial resistance profiling and phenotypic characterization of archived clinicalMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- TrackingACS omega · 2026Review
- Molecular and structural characterization of aMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Decoding the anomalies: a genome-based analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Anthrax: A narrative review.New microbes and new infections · 2024Review
- Comparing microbiological and molecular diagnostic tools for the surveillance of anthrax.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Article
- Comparative Genomics and In Vitro Experiments Provide Insight into the Adaptation and Probiotic Properties ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Characterization of theFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Investigating Anthrax-Associated Virulence Genes among Archival and ContemporaryPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Pan-genome analysis reveals novel chromosomal markers for multiplex PCR-based specific detection of Bacillus anthracis.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- A Pilot Study for the Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Evaluating the Safety ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Bacillus cereus Sepsis in a Patient with Severe Alcoholic Hepatitis.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Article
- Emergence of multidrug-resistant Bacillus spp. derived from animal feed, food and human diarrhea in South-Eastern Bangladesh.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- Early Circulating Edema Factor in Inhalational Anthrax Infection: Does It Matter?Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Get to Know Your Neighbors: Characterization of CloseMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Plant-Associated Representatives of theMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Retrospective Screening of Anthrax-like Disease Induced byPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Phenotypic diagnosis and genotypic identification ofVeterinary world · 2023Article
- Large-Scale Identification of Known and Novel RRNPP Quorum-Sensing Systems by RRNPP_Detector Captures Novel Features of Bacterial, Plasmidic, and Viral Coevolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emerging strains of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.