Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32973447›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2020

A Critical LRRK at the Synapse? The Neurobiological Function and Pathophysiological Dysfunction of LRRK2.

Naila Kuhlmann, Austen J Milnerwood

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Roles in physiology and disease of the inositol phosphatase synaptojanin 1.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular and cell biology of lipids · 2026
    Review
  5. LRRK2 as a Potential Disease-Modifying Target in Sporadic Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Defects of Nutrient Signaling and Autophagy in Neurodegeneration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Naila KuhlmannFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Austen J MilnerwoodFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
McGill University · CAMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the discovery of

Indexed as

genetic mouse modelsLRRK2neuronal culturesneurotransmissionParkinson’s diseasesynapse

Identifiers

PMID32973447
PMCPMC7482583
OpenAlexW3080503232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.