Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32973188›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Generation of myostatin edited horse embryos using CRISPR/Cas9 technology and somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Lucia Natalia Moro, Diego Luis Viale, Juan Ignacio Bastón, Victoria Arnold, Mariana Suvá, Elisabet Wiedenmann, Martín Olguín, Santiago Miriuka, Gabriel Vichera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Cell and Gene Therapy in Equine Ocular Disease.Veterinary ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Genome editing between wonder and rejection.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  6. Osmotically Tunable Microdroplets Enable Amplification-Free CRISPR Detection of Gene Doping.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Conditionally immortalised equine skeletal muscle cell lines forBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lucia Natalia Moro *LIAN-CONICET, Fundación FLENI, Buenos Aires, Argentina. lmoro@fleni.org.ar.
Diego Luis Viale *Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Juan Ignacio BastónKHEIRON BIOTECH S.A, Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Victoria ArnoldKHEIRON BIOTECH S.A, Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mariana SuváKHEIRON BIOTECH S.A, Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Elisabet WiedenmannKHEIRON BIOTECH S.A, Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Martín OlguínKHEIRON BIOTECH S.A, Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Santiago MiriukaLIAN-CONICET, Fundación FLENI, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gabriel VicheraKHEIRON BIOTECH S.A, Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina. vichera@kheiron-biotech.com.
Inis Biotech (Argentina) · ARConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of new technologies for gene editing in horses may allow the generation of improved sportive individuals. Here, we aimed to knock out the myostatin gene (MSTN), a negative regulator of muscle mass development, using CRISPR/Cas9 and to generate edited embryos for the first time in horses. We nucleofected horse fetal fibroblasts with 1, 2 or 5 µg of 2 different gRNA/Cas9 plasmids targeting the first exon of MSTN. We observed that increasing plasmid concentrations improved mutation efficiency. The average efficiency was 63.6% for gRNA1 (14/22 edited clonal cell lines) and 96.2% for gRNA2 (25/26 edited clonal cell lines). Three clonal cell lines were chosen for embryo generation by somatic cell nuclear transfer: one with a monoallelic edition, one with biallelic heterozygous editions and one with a biallelic homozygous edition, which rendered edited blastocysts in each case. Both MSTN editions and off-targets were analyzed in the embryos. In conclusion, CRISPR/Cas9 proved an efficient method to edit the horse genome in a dose dependent manner with high specificity. Adapting this technology sport advantageous alleles could be generated, and a precision breeding program could be developed.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBase SequenceEmbryo, MammalianFemaleFibroblastsGene Knockout TechniquesHorsesMutationMyostatinNuclear Transfer TechniquesSequence HomologyMyostatin

Identifiers

PMID32973188
PMCPMC7518276
OpenAlexW3088112895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.