Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32973087›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Constrained optimal foraging by marine bacterioplankton on particulate organic matter.

Yutaka Yawata, Francesco Carrara, Filippo Menolascina, Roman Stocker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cooperative mixing through hydrodynamic interactions inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The ecological roles of bacterial chemotaxis.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yutaka YawataDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, Institute of Environmental Engineering, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland; yawata.yutaka.ga@u.tsukuba.ac.jp romanstocker@ethz.ch.
Francesco CarraraDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, Institute of Environmental Engineering, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4659-2975
Filippo MenolascinaSchool of Engineering, Institute for Bioengineering, The University of Edinburgh, EH9 3BF Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Roman StockerDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, Institute of Environmental Engineering, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland; yawata.yutaka.ga@u.tsukuba.ac.jp romanstocker@ethz.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal foraging theory provides a framework to understand how organisms balance the benefits of harvesting resources within a patch with the sum of the metabolic, predation, and missed opportunity costs of foraging. Here, we show that, after accounting for the limited environmental information available to microorganisms, optimal foraging theory and, in particular, patch use theory also applies to the behavior of marine bacteria in particle seascapes. Combining modeling and experiments, we find that the marine bacterium

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAppetitive BehaviorCyclic GMPGeologic SedimentsOrganic ChemicalsParticulate MatterPlanktonVibrioCyclic GMPOrganic ChemicalsParticulate Matterbiofilmcyclic di-GMPmotilitypatch use theoryVibrio sp.

Identifiers

PMID32973087
PMCPMC7568300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.