Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32973055›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Qualitative study of antibiotic prescription patterns and associated drivers in Sudan, Guinea-Bissau, Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of Congo.

Tonka Eibs, Alena Koscalova, Mohit Nair, Paul Grohma, Gisa Kohler, Rawa Gafar Bakhit, Mzia Thurashvili, Estrella Lasry, Sandra Wagner Bauer, Carolina Jimenez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tonka EibsVienna Evaluation Unit, Medecins Sans Frontieres, Vienna, Austria.
Alena KoscalovaVienna Evaluation Unit, Medecins Sans Frontieres, Vienna, Austria alena.koscalova@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6838-0842
Mohit NairVienna Evaluation Unit, Medecins Sans Frontieres, Vienna, Austria.
Paul GrohmaInfectious diseases departement, Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Gisa KohlerVienna Evaluation Unit, Medecins Sans Frontieres, Vienna, Austria.
Rawa Gafar BakhitVienna Evaluation Unit, Medecins Sans Frontieres, Vienna, Austria.
Mzia ThurashviliVienna Evaluation Unit, Medecins Sans Frontieres, Vienna, Austria.
Estrella LasryMedical departement, Medecins Sans Frontieres, Barcelona, Spain.
Sandra Wagner BauerVienna Evaluation Unit, Medecins Sans Frontieres, Vienna, Austria.
Carolina JimenezMedical departement, Medecins Sans Frontieres, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of this study was to address the knowledge gap regarding antibiotic use in Medecins Sans Frontiéres (MSF) projects located in Africa by exploring antibiotic prescription and consumption habits and their drivers at different healthcare levels.

designThis study used an exploratory study design through thematic analysis of semistructured, in-depth interviews, focus group discussions (FGDs) and field observations in order to understand the main drivers influencing current antibiotics prescription habits and consumption habits of patients in different geographical settings.

settingThe study took place in MSF centres and towns across four countries: Guinea-Bissau, Central African Republic (CAR), Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Sudan.

participants384 respondents participated in the study, which includes project staff, prescribers, community members, patients, among other groups.

resultsTreatment protocols were physically present in all countries except DRC, but compliance to protocols varied across contexts. A failing health system and barriers to accessing healthcare were perceived as major drivers of overuse and inconsistent prescription practices. Patient demands influenced prescription decisions, and self-medication was commonly reported in the context of failing health systems. Additionally, there was a strong demand for quick cures and communities preferred injections over pills. Patients tended to stop antibiotic treatment once symptoms abated and had major gaps in understanding antibiotic intake instructions and functions.

conclusionsWhile there were specific findings in each context, the larger trend from these four MSF projects in Africa indicates widespread use of antibiotics based on unclear assumptions, which are often influenced by patient demands. There needs to be a broader focus on the balance between access and excess, especially in such fragile contexts where access to healthcare is a real challenge.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsPrescriptionsCentral African RepublicDemocratic Republic of the CongoGuinea-BissauHumansSudanAnti-Bacterial Agentsinfection controlpublic healthqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID32973055
PMCPMC7517544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.