Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32972957›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2020

Diagnostic Value of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction Combined with a Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm during CT of the Oral Cavity.

Y Kubo, K Ito, M Sone, H Nagasawa, Y Onishi, N Umakoshi, T Hasegawa, T Akimoto, M Kusumoto

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Reconstruction Algorithm-Based CT Imaging for the Diagnosis of Hepatic Ascites.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Y KuboFrom the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (Y.K., K.I., M.S., H.N., Y.O., N.U., T.H., M.K.), National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan yukkubo@ncc.go.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-4116-3370
K ItoFrom the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (Y.K., K.I., M.S., H.N., Y.O., N.U., T.H., M.K.), National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0905-6767
M SoneFrom the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (Y.K., K.I., M.S., H.N., Y.O., N.U., T.H., M.K.), National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4597-1500
H NagasawaFrom the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (Y.K., K.I., M.S., H.N., Y.O., N.U., T.H., M.K.), National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7394-4908
Y OnishiFrom the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (Y.K., K.I., M.S., H.N., Y.O., N.U., T.H., M.K.), National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0688-2190
N UmakoshiFrom the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (Y.K., K.I., M.S., H.N., Y.O., N.U., T.H., M.K.), National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8214-3387
T HasegawaFrom the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (Y.K., K.I., M.S., H.N., Y.O., N.U., T.H., M.K.), National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2231-5447
T AkimotoDepartment of Cancer Medicine (Y.K., T.A.), Jikei University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0881-1345
M KusumotoFrom the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (Y.K., K.I., M.S., H.N., Y.O., N.U., T.H., M.K.), National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4557-3609
National Cancer Centre Japan · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeMetal artifacts reduce the quality of CT images and increase the difficulty of interpretation. This study compared the ability of model-based iterative reconstruction and hybrid iterative reconstruction to improve CT image quality in patients with metallic dental artifacts when both techniques were combined with a metal artifact reduction algorithm. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective clinical study included 40 patients (men, 31; women, 9; mean age, 62.9 ± 12.3 years) with oral and oropharyngeal cancer who had metallic dental fillings or implants and underwent contrast-enhanced ultra-high-resolution CT of the neck. Axial CT images were reconstructed using hybrid iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction, and the metal artifact reduction algorithm was applied to all images. Finally, hybrid iterative reconstruction + metal artifact reduction algorithms and model-based iterative reconstruction + metal artifact reduction algorithm data were obtained. In the quantitative analysis, SDs were measured in ROIs over the apex of the tongue (metal artifacts) and nuchal muscle (no metal artifacts) and were used to calculate the metal artifact indexes. In a qualitative analysis, 3 radiologists blinded to the patients' conditions assessed the image-quality scores of metal artifact reduction and structural depictions.

resultsHybrid iterative reconstruction + metal artifact reduction algorithms and model-based iterative reconstruction + metal artifact reduction algorithms yielded significantly different metal artifact indexes of 82.2 and 73.6, respectively (95% CI, 2.6-14.7;

conclusionsModel-based iterative reconstruction + metal artifact reduction algorithms significantly reduced the artifacts and improved the image quality of structural depictions on neck CT images.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtifactsMetalsAdultAgedFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedMouthOropharyngeal NeoplasmsProstheses and ImplantsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedMetals

Identifiers

PMID32972957
PMCPMC7658818
OpenAlexW3088171450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.