Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32972443›Full record

ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2020

Stakeholder views of podiatry services in the UK for people living with arthritis: a qualitative study.

Charlotte Dando, Dawn Bacon, Alan Borthwick, Catherine Bowen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Intersectionality, vulnerability and foot health inequity.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte DandoSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus Building 67, University Road, Southampton, Hampshire, SO17 1BJ, UK. C.Dando@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6954-4212
Dawn BaconSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus Building 67, University Road, Southampton, Hampshire, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Alan BorthwickSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus Building 67, University Road, Southampton, Hampshire, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Catherine BowenSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus Building 67, University Road, Southampton, Hampshire, SO17 1BJ, UK.
University of Southampton · GBArthritis UK · GBSolent NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health CDF-2015-08-032National Institute for Health Research CDF-2015-08-032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to explore the views of stakeholders in podiatry services, patients, commissioners and general practitioners (GP), to further understand experiences of referral, access and provision of treatment in the National Health Service (NHS) for foot problems for patients living with arthritis.

methodTo explore in-depth individual views and experiences of stakeholders in podiatry services, 19 patients who had arthritis (osteoarthritis and/or rheumatoid arthritis) participated in one of four focus groups. In addition, seven commissioners and/or GPs took part in semi structured interviews. A purposive sampling strategy was adopted for all focus groups and semi structured interviews. To account for geographical variations, the focus groups and semi structured interviews were conducted across two predetermined regions of the United Kingdom (UK), Yorkshire and Hampshire. Data was rendered anonymous and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was employed to identify key meanings and report patterns within the data.

resultsFive key themes derived from the focus groups and interviews suggest a variety of factors influencing referral, access and provision of treatment for foot problems within the UK. 1. Systems working together (navigation of different care pathways, access and referral opportunities for people with OA or RA, education around foot health services for people with OA or RA); 2.Finance (financial variations, different care systems, wasting resources); 3. Understanding what podiatry services have to offer (podiatrists are leaders in foot health services, service requirements in relation to training standards and health needs); 4. Person factors of foot pain (arthritis is invisible, affects quality of life, physical and mental wellbeing); 5. Facilitators of foot care (NICE guidelines, stakeholder events, supporting self-management strategies).

conclusionThe findings indicate that patients, commissioners and GPs have very similar experiences of referral, access and provision of treatment for foot problems, for patients living with arthritis. Essentially, commissioners and GPs interviewed called for a transformational approach in current systems to include newer models of care that meet the footcare needs of individual patient circumstances. Patients interviewed called for better signposting and information about the different services available to help them manage their foot health needs. To address this, we have formulated a signposting pack for all stakeholders to help them facilitate access to appropriate clinicians 'at the right time, in the right place' to manage foot health problems.

Indexed as

PodiatryAdultArthritisFemaleFocus GroupsFoot DiseasesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationStakeholder ParticipationArthritisFootcareFoot healthIndependenceMobilityPain managementPodiatryService provision

Identifiers

PMID32972443
PMCPMC7517686
OpenAlexW3088556108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.