Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32972424›Full record

ArticleGlobalization and health2020

Beyond the healthy immigrant paradox: decomposing differences in birthweight among immigrants in Spain.

Mikolaj Stanek, Miguel Requena, Alberto Del Rey, Jesús García-Gómez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Globalization and health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mikolaj StanekDepartment of Sociology and Communication, University of Salamanca, Edificio F.E.S. Avda Francisco Tomás y Valiente s/n Salamanca, 37007, Salamanca, Spain. mstanek@usal.es.ORCID 0000-0001-6878-2086
Miguel RequenaDepartment of Sociology II, UNED, C/Obispo Trejo 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Alberto Del ReyDepartment of Sociology and Communication, University of Salamanca, Edificio F.E.S. Avda Francisco Tomás y Valiente s/n Salamanca, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.
Jesús García-GómezDepartment of Sociology and Communication, University of Salamanca, Edificio F.E.S. Avda Francisco Tomás y Valiente s/n Salamanca, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.

Funding

REINFORCEMENT DELAY AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF TOLERANCEF31DA005802 · NIDA · WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY · PI BYRNE, THOMAS P · 1997 to 1998
–
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe healthy immigrant paradox refers to the unexpected health advantages of immigrant groups settled in host countries. In this population-based study we analyze immigrant advantages in birthweight decomposing differences between infants born to immigrant mothers from specific origins.

methodUsing publicly available data from Spanish Vital Statistics for the period 2007-2017, differential birthweights among several groups of immigrants were estimated with an ordinary least squares regression. The Oaxaca-Blinder regression-based decomposition method was then applied to identify the extent to which differences in birthweight between groups corresponded to compositional disparities or to other factors.

resultsOur analysis of singleton live births to migrant mothers in Spain between 2007 and 2017 (N = 542,137) confirmed the healthy immigrant paradox for certain immigrant populations settled in Spain. Compared with infants born to mothers from high-income countries, the adjusted birthweight was higher for infants born to mothers from non-high- income European countries (33.2 g, 95% CI: 28.3-38.1, P < 0.01), mothers from African countries (52.2 g, 95% CI: 46.9-57.5, P < 0.01), and mothers from Latin American countries (57.4 g, 95% CI: 52.9-61.3, P < 0.01), but lower for infants born to mothers from Asian non-high-income countries (- 31.4 g, 95% CI: - 38.4 to - 24.3, P < 0.01). Decomposition analysis showed that when compared with infants born to mothers from high-income countries, compositional heterogeneity accounts for a substantial proportion of the difference in birthweights. For example, it accounts for 53.5% (95% CI: 24.0-29.7, P < 0.01) of the difference in birthweights for infants born to mothers from non-high-income European countries, 70.9% (95% CI: 60-66.7, P < 0.01) for those born to mothers from African countries, and 38.5% (95% CI: 26.1-29.3, P < 0.01) for those born to mothers from Latin American countries.

conclusionsOur results provide strong population-based evidence for the healthy immigrant paradox in birthweight among certain migrant groups in Spain. However, birth outcomes vary significantly depending on the origins of migrant subpopulations, meaning that not all immigrant groups are unexpectedly healthier. A significant portion of the perinatal health advantage of certain immigrant groups is only a by-product of their group composition (by age, parity, marital status, socioeconomic status, and citizenship of mother, age and migratory status of father and type of delivery) and does not necessarily correspond to other medical, environmental, or behavioral factors.

Indexed as

Birth WeightEmigrants and ImmigrantsHealth StatusAdultFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMothersPregnancySocial ClassSpainTransients and MigrantsCompositional heterogeneityPerinatal healthSpain; healthy immigrant paradox

Identifiers

PMID32972424
PMCPMC7513521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.