ArticleHealth research policy and systems2020
Evaluation of the performance and achievements of the WHO Evidence-informed Policy Network (EVIPNet) Europe.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancing evidence-informed policy: outcomes of the global research agenda on knowledge translation.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- How knowledge translation interventions involving health policy decision makers are evaluated: a scoping review protocol.HRB open research · 2026Article
- Knowledge translation platforms: Broker, intermediary or more? A scoping review of definitions, functions and characteristics.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Article processing charges and health research output in low-income countries: funding cuts, implications for health policy and system management.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- Protocol: What works to increase the use of evidence for policy decision-making: A systematic review.Campbell systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Building bridges: evaluating policymakers' research capacities, engagement, and utilization in health policymaking within the Kuwaiti context: a cross-sectional study.Health research policy and systems · 2024Article
- Enabling cross-country learning and exchange to support universal health coverage implementation.Health policy and planning · 2024Article
- Knowledge management tools and mechanisms for evidence-informed decision-making in the WHO European Region: a scoping review.Health research policy and systems · 2023Article
- Housing and Support for People with Disability: Perspectives of Motor Accident, Disability and Injury Insurers across Australia and New Zealand.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Mapping Chilean clinical research: a protocol for a scoping review and multiple evidence gap maps.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Knowledge translation and evidence generation to increase the impact of vector control in Burkina Faso, Cameroon and Malawi.BMJ global health · 2022Article
- Engaging citizens to improve service provision for oral health.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2022Article
- A comprehensive monitoring and evaluation framework for evidence to policy networks.Evaluation and program planning · 2022Article
- A framework of evidence-based decision-making in health system management: a best-fit framework synthesis.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022Article
- A framework for the promotion of ethical benefit sharing in health research.BMJ global health · 2022Article
- Integrating citizen engagement into evidence-informed health policy-making in eastern Europe and central Asia: scoping study and future research priorities.Health research policy and systems · 2022Article
- Policy options to increase motivation for improving evidence-informed health policy-making in Iran.Health research policy and systems · 2021Article
- [Institutionalizing evidence-based policies in BrazilInstitucionalización de las políticas informadas por evidencia].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Evidence-informed Policy Network (EVIPNet) is one of the key mechanisms introduced by WHO to reduce the research-to-policy gap. EVIPNet Europe was launched in 2012. We evaluated the performance and achievements of EVIPNet Europe with the overall aims (1) to inform future developments and strategic planning of EVIPNet Europe and (2) to contribute to the evidence base for organisational knowledge translation activities by sharing the lessons learnt.
methodsThe evaluation covered the WHO Secretariat of EVIPNet Europe and its 21 member countries, from its inception to mid-2018. A mixed methods design was used to assess changes in three domains, including triangulation of quantitative and qualitative methods, based on the EVIPNet Europe Monitoring & Evaluation framework and theory of change. Data were collected between August and October 2018. Data collection comprised documentary review, social media analysis, online country evaluation, key informant interviews and validated tools. Two case studies were also developed.
resultsThe evaluation showed promising results as well as lessons to guide the future development of EVIPNet in the WHO European Region and other regions of the world. EVIPNet Europe appears to be filling a niche in promoting the capacity of Network member countries for evidence-informed policy-making. There is evidence that EVIPNet Europe's capacity-building programme of work is improving knowledge and skills at the individual level. There has been an increase in activity and outputs since its establishment and evidence has been used to inform new policies in some member countries. However, the speed at which member countries are developing or publishing products varies greatly and no formalised knowledge translation platforms have yet been created. Financial and human resources are limited and staff turnover is a cause for concern, both at the WHO Secretariat and country team levels.
conclusionsSix years since the launch of EVIPNet Europe, the Network has grown quickly, is clearly valued and has had some successes. However, more work and support are needed if it is to achieve its vision of a Europe in which high-quality, context-sensitive evidence routinely informs health decision-making processes that ultimately serve to strengthen health outcomes across the Region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.