Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32972369›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

Multiple omics analysis reveals that high fiber diets promote gluconeogenesis and inhibit glycolysis in muscle.

Jianghong Wu, Ding Yang, Husile Gong, Yunxia Qi, Hailian Sun, Yongbin Liu, Yahong Liu, Xiao Qiu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jianghong WuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities, Tongliao, 028000, China. wujianghonglong@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4027-2345
Ding YangInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, 010031, China.
Husile GongCollege of Life Science, Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities, Tongliao, 028000, China.
Yunxia QiInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, 010031, China.
Hailian SunInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, 010031, China.
Yongbin LiuInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, 010031, China.
Yahong LiuInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, 010031, China.
Xiao QiuInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, 010031, China.
Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences · CNInner Mongolia University for Nationalities · CN

Funding

Innovation Foundation of Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences (IMAAAHS) 2017CXJJM03-2National Natural Science Foundation of China 31560623Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia 2018MS03034the Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities BS527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeat quality is a complex trait affected by genotypic and environmental factors. In a previous study, it was found that feedstuffs have various effects on the growth rate and meat quality of lambs. However, the underlying mechanisms are still not entirely clear.

resultsIn this study, to investigate the mechanisms that impact meat quality in twin sheep fed either with high fiber low protein (HFLP) forage (Ceratoides) or low fiber high protein (LFHP) forage (alfalfa) diets, multi omics techniques were utilized for integration analysis based on the feed nutritional value and the sheep microbiome, transcriptome, metabolome, and fatty acid profile. Results showed that the production performance and the muscle components of lambs were significantly affected by feeds. The essential fatty acid (linoleic acid and arachidonic acid) content of the muscle, based on gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis, was increased when lambs were fed with HFLP. The microbes in the lambs' rumen fed a HFLP diet were more diverse than those of the LFHP fed group. Besides, the ratio of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes in the rumen of the sheep fed a LFHP diet was 2.6 times higher than that of the HFLP fed group. Transcriptome analysis of the muscle revealed that the genes related to glucose metabolic processes and fatty acid biosynthesis were significantly differentially expressed between the two groups. Potential cross talk was found between the sfour omics data layers, which helps to understand the mechanism by which feedstuffs affect meat quality of lambs.

conclusionFeed systems may affect the epigenetic regulation of genes involved in the glucose metabolic pathway. HFLP feeds could induce gluconeogenesis to maintain glucose levels in blood, resulting in decreased fat content in muscle. The multiple omics analysis showed that the microbiota structure is significantly correlated with the metabolome and gene expression in muscle. This study laid a theoretical foundation for controlling the nutrient intake of sheep; it suggested that its fatty acid spectrum modifications and the removal of meat quality detrimental material could guide sheep feeding for functional mutton.

Indexed as

GluconeogenesisGlycolysisTranscriptomeAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsArachidonic AcidDietary FiberGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLinoleic AcidMetabolomeMuscle, SkeletalRed MeatSheepArachidonic AcidDietary FiberLinoleic AcidGlucose metabolismIntegrative analysisMeat qualityMetabolomeRuminal microbiomeTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID32972369
PMCPMC7513505
OpenAlexW3089314122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.