ArticleBMC genomics2020
Intra-species variation within Lactobacillus rhamnosus correlates to beneficial or harmful outcomes: lessons from the oral cavity.
Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Photoinduced Fluorescence Changes in Selected Bacterial Strains Under 405 nm Laser Excitation: An In Vitro Hue-Based Monitoring Approach.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Article
- Lactobacilli and human dental caries: more than mechanical retention.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2022Article
- Ethnic Specificity of Species and Strain Composition ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe origin of most of the Lactobacillus rhamnosus genome sequences lodged in NCBI can be traced to food and faecal isolates followed by blood and tissue sites but with minimal representation from oral and vaginal isolates. However, on the L. rhamnosus phylogenetic tree no apparent clade is linked to the origin of isolation or to the relevant clinical source, except for a distinct clade exclusively shared by L. rhamnosus isolates from early stages of dental pulp infection (LRHMDP2 and LRHMDP3) and from bronchoalveolar lavage (699_LRHA and 708_LRHA) from a critical care patient. These L. rhamnosus strains, LRHMDP2, LRHMDP3, 699_LRHA and 708_LRHA isolated from different continents, display closest genome neighbour gapped identity of 99.95%. The aim of this study was to define a potentially unique complement of genes of clinical relevance shared between these L. rhamnosus clinical isolates in comparison to probiotic L. rhamnosus strains.
resultsIn this analysis we used orthologous protein identification tools such as ProteinOrtho followed by tblastn alignments to identify a novel tyrosine protein phosphatase (wzb)-tyrosine-protein kinase modulator EpsC (wzd)- synteny exopolysaccharide (EPS) cluster. This EPS cluster was specifically conserved in a clade of 5 clinical isolates containing the four L. rhamnosus clinical isolates noted above and Lactobacillus spp. HMSC077C11, a clinical isolate from a neck abscess. The EPS cluster was shared with only two other strains, L. rhamnosus BPL5 and BPL15, which formed a distant clade on the L. rhamnosus phylogenetic tree, with a closest genome neighbour gapped identity of 97.51% with L. rhamnosus LRHMDP2 and LRHMDP3. Exclusivity of this EPS cluster (from those identified before) was defined by five EPS genes, which were specifically conserved between the clade of 5 clinical isolates and L. rhamnosus BPL5 and BPL15 when compared to the remaining L. rhamnosus strains. Comparative genome analysis between the clade of 5 clinical isolates and L. rhamnosus BPL5 and BPL15 showed a set of 58 potentially unique genes characteristic of the clade of 5.
conclusionThe potentially unique functional protein orthologs associated with the clade of 5 clinical isolates may provide understanding of fitness under selective pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.