Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32972102›Full record

ArticleAnnals of coloproctology2021

Proposal for a New Score: Hemorrhoidal Bleeding Score.

Nadia Fathallah, Hélène Beaussier, Gilles Chatellier, Jean Meyer, Marc Sapoval, Nadia Moussa, Vincent de Parades

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of coloproctology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07264413 (Bleeding Reduction in Grade II-III Haemorrhoids Through Embolization Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07264413 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Bleeding Reduction in Grade II-III Haemorrhoids Through Embolization Treatment

TypeobservationalSponsorCardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of EuropeRan2026 to 2030Enrolled250ConditionsHemorrhoid, Hemorrhoid BleedingArmsHaemorrhoid artery embolizsation (HAE)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Emborrhoid: Rectal Artery Embolization for Hemorrhoid Disease.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nadia FathallahService de Proctologie Médico-Chirurgicale, GH Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France.
Hélène BeaussierCentre de Recherche Clinique, GH Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France.
Gilles ChatellierCentre d'Investigation Clinique 1418 (CIC1418), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France.
Jean MeyerService de Proctologie Médico-Chirurgicale, GH Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France.
Marc SapovalService de Radiologie Vasculaire, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France.
Nadia MoussaService de Radiologie Vasculaire, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France.
Vincent de ParadesService de Proctologie Médico-Chirurgicale, GH Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France.
Hôpital Paris Saint-Joseph · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

Paris Saint-Joseph Hospital
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe conducted a prospective study to evaluate a new hemorrhoidal bleeding score (HBS).

methodsAll consecutive patients who had consulted between May 1, 2016 and June 30, 2017 for bleeding hemorrhoidal disease were prospectively assessed at a proctological department. The study was conducted in 2 stages. The first stage assessed the validity of the score on a prospective patient cohort. A second stage assessed the interobserver reproducibility of the score on another prospective cohort.

resultsOne hundred consecutive patients were studied (57 males; mean age, 49.70 years). A positive association between HBS and surgery indication was found (P<0.001). A cut-off value of the score of 5 (≤5 vs. >5) separated patients from surgical to medical-instrumental treatment with a sensitivity and specificity of 75.00% and 81.25%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, only HBS was significantly associated with the operative decision (odds ratio, 12.22). Prolapse was no longer significantly associated with the surgical indication. After a mean follow-up after treatment of 7 months, HBS improved statistically significantly (P<0.0001). For the reproducibility of the score, an additional 30 consecutive patients (13 males; mean age, 53.14 years) were enrolled with an excellent agreement between 2 proctologists (kappa=0.983).

conclusionHBS is sensitive, specific, and reproducible. It can assess the severity of hemorrhoidal bleeding. It can discriminate between the most severe surgery-indicated patients and does so in a more efficient way than the Goligher prolapse score. It also allows quantifying the extent of change in hemorrhoidal bleeding after treatment.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal bleedingHemorrhoidal treatment, SurgeryHemorrhoidsProlapse

Identifiers

PMID32972102
PMCPMC8566148
OpenAlexW3088815408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.