Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32971615›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2020

Making the decision to donate eyes: Perspectives from the families of the deceased in Madurai, India.

Ganesh-Babu B Subburaman, John H Kempen, Saravanan Durairaj, Vijayakumar Balakrishnan, Vijayakumar Valaguru, Venkatesh Prajna Namperumalsamy, Ravilla Duraisamy Thulasiraj, Sachin Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comments: Pendleton'sIndian journal of ophthalmology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ganesh-Babu B SubburamanLAICO, Aravind Eye Care System, Madurai, India.
John H KempenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA; and MCM Eye Unit, Myungsung Christian Medical Center and Myung Sung Medical School, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Saravanan DurairajAravind Eye Hospital, Madurai, India.
Vijayakumar BalakrishnanLAICO, Aravind Eye Care System, Madurai, India.
Vijayakumar ValaguruLAICO, Aravind Eye Care System, Madurai, India.
Venkatesh Prajna NamperumalsamyAravind Eye Hospital, Madurai, India.
Ravilla Duraisamy ThulasirajLAICO, Aravind Eye Care System, Madurai, India.
Sachin GuptaSC Johnson College of Business, Cornell University, Ithaca NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify factors affecting family members' decision whether to donate eye organs.

methodsA community-based case-control study based on in-home interviews with families of deceased individuals who had or had not donated eye organs, in Madurai district, Tamil Nadu, India. Data collected were knowledge and awareness of eye donations, whether the deceased individual had expressed or pledged willingness to donate, and family members' attitudes and willingness to donate their own eye organs.

resultsSeventy-six families of donors and 256 families of non-donors completed the survey. Multivariable analysis showed that the following variables were significantly associated with a donation: age, whether the deceased had registered for eye donation, pre-expressed willingness of deceased to donate, whether family members personally know beneficiaries of eye donations, and higher score on a scale evaluating knowledge and awareness about eye donation. The majority of donors' families (71%) had been encouraged by someone to donate. Among non-donor families, a substantially larger fraction (52.8%) indicated they would have donated had someone reminded or encouraged them to do so, in comparison with those who indicated lack of awareness or knowledge (14.5%).

conclusionCommunity programs are likely to be effective if they encourage individuals to pledge their eyes or express their willingness to donate their eyes to family members in advance of death; they increase public awareness of the value of eye donation. A friend, family member, neighbor or counselor approaching bereaved families and having a dialogue about eye donation would substantially increase the probability of a decision to donate.

Indexed as

Tissue and Organ ProcurementCase-Control StudiesDecision MakingFamilyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIndiaSurveys and QuestionnairesTissue DonorsAttitudescase-control studycorneal transplantationeye donations

Identifiers

PMID32971615
PMCPMC7728020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.