Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32971531›Full record

ReviewJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2021

"Living Well" After Burn Injury: Using Case Reports to Illustrate Significant Contributions From the Burn Model System Research Program.

Gretchen J Carrougher, Kara McMullen, Dagmar Amtmann, Audrey E Wolfe, Diana Tenney, Jeffrey C Schneider, Joseph Yeakley, Radha K Holavanahalli, Loren Patterson, Christopher Madison and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gretchen J CarrougherDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Kara McMullenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Dagmar AmtmannDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Audrey E WolfeDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Diana Tenney
Jeffrey C SchneiderDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Joseph Yeakley
Radha K HolavanahalliUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Loren PattersonUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Christopher Madison
Nicole S GibranDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
University of Washington · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USHarvard University · USSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital · US

Funding

ACL HHS 90DPBU0001ACL HHS 90DPBU0002ACL HHS 90DPBU0004ACL HHS 90DPGE0004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Burn Model System (BMS) program of research has been funded since 1993 by the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR). The overarching aim of this program is to improve outcomes and quality of life for people with burns in the areas of health and function, employment, and community living and participation. This review reports on BMS contributions that have affected the lives of individuals with a significant burn injury using case reports to associate BMS contributions with recovery. In January 2020, current BMS grantee researchers assessed peer-reviewed BMS publications from 1994 to 2020. Using case report methodology, contributions were linked to three individuals treated at one of the four Burn Model System institutions. With over 25 years of NIDILRR funding, unique BMS contributions to patient recovery were identified and categorized into one of several domains: treatment, assessment measures, sequelae, peer support, employment, and long-term functional outcomes. A second review for significant results of BMS research that add to the understanding of burn injury, pathophysiology, and recovery research was identified and categorized as injury recovery research. The case study participants featured in this review identified select NIDILRR research contributions as having direct, personal benefit to their recovery. The knowledge generation and clinical innovation that this research program has contributed to our collective understanding of recovery after burn injury is considerable. Using case study methodology with three adult burn survivors, we highlight the impact and individual significance of program findings and reinforce the recognition that the value of any clinical research must have relevance to the lives of the study population.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementQuality of LifeBurnsHumansIndependent LivingPersons with DisabilitiesRehabilitation ResearchSurvivorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32971531
PMCPMC10044562
OpenAlexW3087929449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.